Stochastic models for cell populations undergoing transitions

Doctoral thesis English OPEN
Rana, Anas A.
  • Subject: QH301

Transformations on a cellular level caused by changes in gene expression, protein abundance, or epigenetic features present in cells play a key role in differentiation, reprogramming and disease. Such transformations are frequently stochastic on a single-cell level. The result is a heterogeneous cell population with an ever-changing mixture. Often cells undergo transformation via intermediate stages, which further convolute the transformation process. Reliable high-throughput data is commonly obtained on a cell population level therefore elucidating the underlying single-cell process is challenging. In this thesis we present and analyse models that probe population level data to answer questions about the transformation process and to distinguish between states.\ud \ud We investigate a recently proposed stochastic model for transition processes called STAMM, which is based on a latent Markov chain at the single-cell level. We present a computationally efficient unbiased approach to estimation, model selection and setting of tuning parameters. To complement our understanding of properties and behaviour of the model we implement a single-cell simulation setup. This not only allows us to investigate parameter estimation but we can also explore behaviour under violations of model assumptions. We also empirically investigate identifiability of the model. We apply the model to oncogenic transformation where the data time-course consists of genome-wide RNA-seq measurements. We also compare results from application of STAMM to a stem cell reprogramming microarray time-course to single-cell measurements carried out independently. Results show that not only is the model robust under mild violations of assumptions but state specific results can be compared to single-cell measurements. Under stronger violation of assumptions transitions between states are not estimated well. The model is therefore especially useful to steer further experiments in the right direction.\ud \ud We then present a model that examines the response of cells in the cell cycle to incident radiation at different doses. Cells can either undergo programmed cell death or re-enter the cell cycle after an interruption. A genome-wide RNA-seq measurement is made at the initial time point and subsequently fractions of cells with contrasting cell-fates can be distinguished and counted. The model assigns a score to each gene corresponding to its importance in determining cell fate. We implement a single-cell level simulation procedure and carry out illustrative simulations for one gene and for four genes. Parameter estimation in this model allows distinguishing genes that are important from genes that are not. This is only possible as long as the noise level is not too high.
  • References (60)
    60 references, page 1 of 6

    Alberts, B., Johnson, A., Lewis, J., Ra↵, M., Roberts, K., & Walter, P. (2007). Molecular Biology of the Cell, Fifth Edition. Garland Science.

    Amari, S. (2013). Dreaming of mathematical neuroscience for half a century. Neural Networks, 37 (0), 48 - 51.

    Armond, J. W., Saha, K., Rana, A. A., Oates, C. J., Jaenisch, R., Nicodemi, M., & Mukherjee, S. (2014). A stochastic model dissects cell states in biological transition processes. Scientific Reports, 4 .

    Bagci, H., & Fisher, A. G. (2013). DNA Demethylation in Pluripotency and Reprogramming: The Role of Tet Proteins and Cell Division. Stem Cell , 13 (3), 265-269.

    Bar-Joseph, Z., Farkash, S., Gi↵ord, D. K., Simon, I., & Rosenfeld, R. (2004). Deconvolving cell cycle expression data with complementary information. Bioinformatics, 20 (suppl 1), i23-i30.

    Bar-Joseph, Z., Siegfried, Z., Brandeis, M., Brors, B., Lu, Y., Eils, R., Dynlacht, B. D., & Simon, I. (2008). Genome-wide transcriptional analysis of the human cell cycle identifies genes di↵erentially regulated in normal and cancer cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105 (3), 955-960.

    Baum, L. E., & Petrie, T. (1966). Statistical Inference for Probabilistic Functions of Finite State Markov Chains. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 37 (6), 1554- 1563.

    Bock, C., Kiskinis, E., Verstappen, G., Gu, H., Boulting, G., Smith, Z. D., Ziller, M., Croft, G. F., Amoroso, M. W., Oakley, D. H., Gnirke, A., Eggan, K., & Meissner, A. (2011). Reference Maps of Human ES and iPS Cell Variation Enable High-Throughput Characterization of Pluripotent Cell Lines. Cell , 144 (3), 439-452.

    Brown, P. O., & Botstein, D. (1999). Exploring the new world of the genome with DNA microarrays. Nature Genetics, 21 , 33-37.

    Buganim, Y., Faddah, D. A., Cheng, A. W., Itskovich, E., Markoulaki, S., Ganz, K., Klemm, S. L., van Oudenaarden, A., & Jaenisch, R. (2012). Single-Cell Expression Analyses during Cellular Reprogramming Reveal an Early Stochastic and a Late Hierarchic Phase. Cell , 150 (6), 1209-1222.

  • Related Research Results (2)
  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    Warwick Research Archives Portal Repository - IRUS-UK 0 14
Share - Bookmark