Hegemony and its discontents: A critical analysis of organizational knowledge transfer

Article English OPEN
Mir, R. ; Banerjee, S. B. ; Miri, A. (2008)

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to discuss the phenomenon of knowledge transfer within multinational corporations (MNCs), and how the imperatives of thought and action that constitute new knowledge are received in the terrain that constitutes the MNC subsidiary. \ud \ud Design/methodology/approach - This study employs an ethnographic approach, and juxtaposes primary data collection with a variety of secondary data sources. \ud \ud Findings - The data are analyzed in light of the theoretical construct of hegemony, and three themes theorized that underlie the process of knowledge transfer. These include knowledge loss at the local level, the coercive practices that ensure knowledge transfer, and the invocation of imperial subjectivities by the headquarters of the MNC when dealing with subsidiaries from poorer nations. \ud \ud Originality/value - This paper goes beyond the mainstream approaches into organizational knowledge transfer, by analyzing these issues in light of political economy, and the changing landscape of industrial accumulation. It offers in some measure, the building blocks of a different organizational theory, one that is sensitive to those subjects who are consigned to the periphery of mainstream organizing.
  • References (13)
    13 references, page 1 of 2

    Almeida, P. & Phene, A. (2004). 'Subsidiaries and knowledge creation: The influence of the MNC and host country innovation'. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 847-864.

    Alvesson, M. & Kärreman, D. (2001). 'Odd couple: Making sense of the curious concept of knowledge management'. Journal of Management Studies, 38, 7, 996-1018.

    Banerjee, S.B. (2000). 'Whose land is it anyway? National interest, indigenous stakeholders and colonial discourses: The case of the Jabiluka uranium mine'. Organization & Environment, 13, 1, 3-38.

    Barley, S. R. (1996). 'Technicians in the workplace: Ethnographic evidence for bringing work into organization studies'. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41:404-441.

    Bate, S. (1997). 'Whatever happened to organizational anthropology?' Human Relations, 50: 1147-1175.

    Becker, M.C. (2001). 'Managing dispersed knowledge: Organizational problems, managerial strategies and their effectiveness.” Journal of Management Studies, 38, 7, 1037-1051.

    Brown, J.S. & Duguid, P. (1998). 'Organizing knowledge'. California Management Review, 40, 3, 90-111.

    Brown, J.S. & Duguid, P. (2001). 'Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective'. Organization Science, 12, 2, 198-213.

    Chandrasekhar, C.P. & Ghosh, J. (2002). The Market that Failed: A Decade of Neoliberal Economic Reforms in India. New Delhi: Leftword Books.

    Coff, R., Coff, D. & Eastvold, D. (2006). The knowledge-leveraging paradox: How to achieve scale without making knowledge imitable. Academy of Management Review, 31(2): 452- 465.

  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    City Research Online - IRUS-UK 0 145
Share - Bookmark