Deriving a Preference-Based Measure for Cancer Using the EORTC QLQ-C30

Article, Other literature type, Book English OPEN
Rowen, D. ; Brazier, J. ; Young, T. ; Gaugris, S. ; Craig, B.M. ; King, M.T. ; Velikova, G. (2011)
  • Publisher: Elsevier
  • Journal: Value in Health, volume 14, issue 5, pages 721-731 (issn: 1098-3015)
  • Related identifiers: doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.01.004
  • Subject: Health Policy | Article | Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
    mesheuropmc: humanities | social sciences

Background: The EORTC QLQ-C30 is one of the most commonly used measures in cancer but in its current form cannot be used in economic evaluation as it does not incorporate preferences.\ud \ud Methods and results: We address this gap by estimating a preference-based single index for cancer from the EORTC QLQ-C30 for use in economic evaluation. Factor analysis, Rasch analysis and other psychometric analyses were undertaken on a clinical trial dataset of 655 patients with multiple myeloma to derive a health state classification from the QLQ-C30 that is amenable to valuation. The resulting health state classification system has 8 dimensions (physical functioning, role functioning, social functioning, emotional functioning, pain, fatigue and sleep disturbance, nausea, and constipation and diarrhoea) with 4 or 5 levels each. A valuation study was conducted of 350 members of the UK general population using ranking and time trade-off. Mean and individual level additive multivariate regression models including the episodic random utility model were fitted to the valuation data to derive preference weights for the classification system. Mean absolute error ranges from 0.046 to 0.054 and models have few inconsistencies (0 to 2) in estimated preference weights.\ud \ud Conclusions: We conclude that it is feasible to derive a preference-based measure from the EORTC QLQ-C30 for use in economic evaluation, but this work needs to be extended to other countries and replicated across other patient groups.
  • References (18)
    18 references, page 1 of 2

    Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1993 Mar 3; 85(5):365-76. [PubMed: 8433390]

    Brazier JE, Dixon S. The use of condition specific outcome measures in economic appraisal. Health Economics. 1995; 4:255-264. [PubMed: 8528428]

    Brazier JE, Harper R, Thomas K, Jones N, Underwood T. Deriving a preference based single index measure from the SF-36. J Clinical Epidemiology. 1998; 51 (11):1115-1129.

    Brazier J, Roberts J, Deverill M. The estimation a preference-based single index measure for health from the SF-36. Journal of Health Economics. 2002; 21(2):271-292. [PubMed: 11939242]

    Brazier J, Roberts J. The estimation of a preference-based index from the SF-12. Medical Care. 2004; 42:851-859. [PubMed: 15319610]

    Brazier, JE.; Ratcliffe, J.; Tsuchiya, A.; Solomon, J. Measuring and valuing health for economic evaluation. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007.

    Brazier JE, Czoski-Murray C, Roberts J, Brown M, Symonds T, Kelleher C. Estimation of a preference-based index from a condition specific measure: the King's Health Questionnaire. Medical Decision Making. 2008; 28(1):113-126. [PubMed: 17641139]

    Brazier J, Yang Y, Tsuchiya A, Rowen D. A review of studies mapping (or cross walking) from nonpreference based measures of health to generic preference-based measures. European Journal of Health Economics. 2009 Forthcoming.

    Chatfield, C.; Collins, AJ. Introduction to Multivariate Analysis. Chapman and Hall; 1980.

    Cohen, J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. New York: Academic Press; 1978.

  • Related Research Results (1)
  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark