Heparin for assisted reproduction (Review)

Article English OPEN
Akhtar, Muhammad A. ; Sur, Shyamaly D. ; Raine-Fenning, Nick ; Jayaprakasan, Kannamannadiar ; Thornton, Jim ; Quenby, Siobhan (2013)

Abstract\ud BACKGROUND:\ud Heparin as an adjunct in assisted reproduction (peri-implantation heparin) is given at or after egg collection or at embryo transfer during assisted reproduction. Heparin has been advocated to improve embryo implantation and clinical outcomes. It has been proposed that heparin enhances the intra-uterine environment by improving decidualisation with an associated activation of growth factors and a cytokine expression profile in the endometrium that is favourable to pregnancy.\ud OBJECTIVES:\ud To investigate whether the administration of heparin around the time of implantation (peri-implantation heparin) improves clinical outcomes in subfertile women undergoing assisted reproduction.\ud SEARCH METHODS:\ud A comprehensive and exhaustive search strategy was developed in consultation with the Trials Search Co-ordinator of the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group (MDSG). The strategy was used in an attempt to identify all relevant studies regardless of language or publication status (published, unpublished, in press, and in progress). Relevant trials were identified from both electronic databases and other resources (last search 6 May 2013).\ud SELECTION CRITERIA:\ud All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were included where peri-implantation heparin was given during assisted reproduction. Peri-implantation low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) during IVF/ICSI was given at or after egg collection or at embryo transfer in the included studies. Live birth rate was the primary outcome.\ud DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS:\ud Two review authors independently assessed the eligibility and quality of trials and extracted relevant data. The quality of the evidence was evaluated using GRADE methods.\ud MAIN RESULTS:\ud Three RCTs (involving 386 women) were included in the review.Peri-implantation LMWH administration during assisted reproduction was associated with a significant improvement in live birth rate compared with placebo or no LMWH (odds ratio (OR) 1.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07 to 2.90, three studies, 386 women, I(2) = 51%, very low quality evidence with high heterogeneity). There was also a significant improvement in the clinical pregnancy rate with use of LMWH (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.03 to 2.53, three studies, 386 women, I(2) = 29%, very low quality evidence with low heterogeneity).However these findings should be interpreted with extreme caution as they were dependent upon the choice of statistical method: they were no longer statistically significant when a random-effects model was used.Adverse events were poorly reported in all included studies, with no comparative data available. However, LMWH did cause adverse effects including bruising, ecchymosis, bleeding, thrombocytopenia and allergic reactions. It appeared that these adverse effects were increased if heparin therapy was used over a longer duration.\ud AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS:\ud The results of this Cochrane review of three randomised controlled trials with a total of 386 women suggested that peri-implantation LMWH in assisted reproduction treatment (ART) cycles may improve the live birth rate in women undergoing assisted reproduction. However, these results were dependent on small low quality studies with substantial heterogeneity, and were sensitive to the choice of statistical model. There were side effects reported with use of heparin, including bruising and bleeding, and no reliable data on long-term effects. The results do not justify this use of heparin outside well-conducted research trials.These findings need to be further investigated with well-designed, adequately powered, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, multicentre trials. Further investigations could also focus on the effects of the local (uterine) and not systemic application of heparin during ART.
  • References (12)
    12 references, page 1 of 2

    O 4 O 2 i

    d 0 d 4 e u o .8 u o .9 h Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (version 5.1.0; chapter 6, 6.4.11) (Higgins 2011):

    1. The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library latest issue) (see Appendix 1).

    2. English language electronic databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycINFO (see Appendix 2, Appendix 3, Appendix 4).

    3. The Cochrane Library (www.cochrane.org/index.htm) for DARE, the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (reference lists from non-Cochrane reviews on similar topics).

    4. Current Controlled Trials (www.controlled-trials.com).

    5. The World Health Organization International Trials Registry Platform search portal (www.who.int/trialsearch/ Default.aspx). 1. Live birth rate per woman 1. Clinical pregnancy rates per woman Poehlmann 2005

    tuning through LIF, signalling via Stat3. Placenta 2005;26

    Suppl:37-41. Warkentin 1995

    Journal of Medicine 1995;332:1330-5. Thrombolytic Therapy. Chest 2004;126 Suppl:311-37. Weigert 2001

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark