Women’s adaptation to STEM domains promotes resilience and a lesser reliance on heuristic thinking

Article English OPEN
di Bella, Laura ; Crisp, Richard (2016)

Experiences that compel people to challenge social stereotypes can promote enhanced cognitive flexibility on a range of judgmental domains. Women in STEM (science, technology, engineering, and math) fields are chronically exposed to such experiences and may therefore also demonstrate these benefits. Two studies examined the differential effects of counterstereotypical experiences on women from STEM and non-STEM fields. Results showed that imagining or recollecting these experiences led women from STEM fields to exhibit a lesser reliance on heuristic thinking compared to women from non-STEM fields, and this difference was mediated by self-perceived resilience to the negative impact of gender stereotyping. Implications for psychologists’ and educators’ understanding of the relationship between counterstereotypical experiences and heuristic thinking are discussed.
  • References (54)
    54 references, page 1 of 6

    Appel, M., Kronberger, N., & Aronson, J. (2011). Stereotype threat impairs ability building: Effects on test preparation among women in science and technology. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(7), 904-913. doi:10.1002/ejsp.835

    Blickenstaff, J. C. (2005). Women and science careers: Leaky pipeline or gender filter? Gender and Education, 17(4), 369-386. doi:10.1080/09540250500145072

    Busenitz, L. W., & Barney, J. B. (1997). Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(1), 9-30. doi:10.1016/S0883-9026(96)00003-1

    Chen, S., & Chaiken, S. (1999). The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 73-96). New York, NY, US: Guilford Press.

    Cheng, C. Y., Sanchez-Burks, J., & Lee, F. (2008). Connecting the dots within. Psychological Science, 19(11), 1178-1183. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02220.x

    Cheryan, S., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2000). When positive stereotypes threaten intellectual performance: The psychological hazards of “model minority” status. Psychological Science, 11(5), 399-402. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00277

    Crisp, R. J., Bache, L. M., & Maitner, A. (2009). Dynamics of social comparison in counterstereotypic domains: Stereotype boost, not stereotype threat, for women engineering majors. Social Influence, 4, 171-184. doi:10.1080/15534510802607953

    Crisp, R. J., Birtel, M. D., & Meleady, R. (2011). Mental simulations of social thought and action: Trivial tasks or tools for transforming social policy? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 261-264. doi:10.1177/0963721411413762

    Gocłowska, M. A., Crisp, R. J., & Labuschagne, K. (2013). Can counter-stereotypes boost flexible thinking? Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1368430212445076

    Good, C., Aronson, J., & Harder, J. A. (2008). Problems in the pipeline: Stereotype threat and

  • Related Research Results (1)
  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    Aston Publications Explorer - IRUS-UK 0 35
Share - Bookmark