Geneva rhetoric, national reality : the political economy of introducing plant breeders' rights in Kenya

Article English OPEN
Rangnekar, Dwijen

The article is about implementing obligations under Article 27.3(b) of the Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property (TRIPS). However, concerned with the fragmentation of international law in a globalised world, the article uses Kenya as a case study to interrogate the apparent choice and latitude in Article 27.3(b). At the TRIPS Council, Kenya has sought to locate Article 27.3(b) within a wider frame by adroitly norm-borrowing, and it canvassed for integrating norms and principles from other multilateral agreements into TRIPS. Yet, when introducing plant breeders' rights into domestic law, Kenya fails to either explore the apparent latitude or deliver on its rhetoric in Geneva. I explain this decoupling between Geneva rhetoric (ritual) and domestic law (behaviour) as another symptom of what Steinberg [(2002), ‘In the Shadow of Law or Power? Consensus-Based Bargaining and Outcomes in the GATT/WTO’, International Organization, 56 (2), pp. 339–74)] characterises as ‘organised hypocrisy’ of the World Trade Organisation. In demonstrating that fragmentation in global legal architecture may not automatically emerge in domestic law, the article draws out the significance of attending to a domestic political economy of law-making.
  • References (92)
    92 references, page 1 of 10

    Akroyd, S., Kiome, R.M. and Ndiritu, C.G. (2004), 'Financing Agricultural Research', in C.G. Ndiritu, J.K. Lynam and A.N. Mbabu (eds), Transformation of Agricultural Research Systems (East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press), pp. 361-82.

    Anon. (1999). 'Initiatives for Sustainable Seed Systems in Africa', in Seed Policy and Programmes for Sub-Saharan Africa: Proceedings of the Regional Technical Meeting on Seed Policy and Programmes

    D for Sub-Saharan Africa, Abidjan, Coˆte d'Ivoire, 23- 27 November 1998 (Rome: Food and Agriculture Organisation), pp. 191 - 205.

    Anuradha, R.V. (1997), 'In Search of Knowledge and Resources: Who Sows? Who Reaps?', Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, 6 (3), pp. 263-73.

    Aoki, K. and Luvai, K. (2007), 'Reclaiming “Common Heritage” Treatment in the International Plant Genetic Resources Regime Complex', Michigan State Law Review, 35 (1), pp. 35-70.

    Bavikatte, K. and Robinson, D.F. (2011), 'Towards a People's History of the Law: Biocultural Jurisprudence and the Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit Sharing', Law, Environment and Development Journal, 7 (1), pp. 35-51.

    Bent, S.A., et al. (1987), Intellectual Property Rights in Biotechnology Worldwide (New York: Stockton Press).

    Bolo, M. (2005), Agricultural Systems of Science, Technology and Innovation: The Case of Kenya's Floriculture Industry (Wageningen: Technical Centre for Agriculture and Rural Cooperation (CTA)).

    Bragdon, S., Garforth, K. and Haapala, J.K., Jr. (2008), 'Safeguarding Biodiversity: The Convention on Biological Diversity', in G. Tansey and T. Rajotte (eds), The Future Control of Food: A Guide to International Negotiations and Rules on Intellectual Property, Biodiversity, and Food Security (London: Earthscan/ IDRC), pp. 82-114.

    Braithwaite, J. and Drahos, P. (2000), Global Business Regulation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

  • Metrics
    0
    views in OpenAIRE
    0
    views in local repository
    38
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    Warwick Research Archives Portal Repository - IRUS-UK 0 38
Share - Bookmark