Feasibility and acceptability of point of care HIV testing in community outreach and GUM drop-in services in the North West of England: A programmatic evaluation

Article English OPEN
MacPherson, Peter ; Chawla, Anu ; Jones, Kathy ; Coffey, Emer ; Spaine, Vida ; Harrison, Ian ; Jelliman, Pauline ; Phillips-Howard, Penelope ; Beynon, Caryl ; Taegtmeyer, Miriam (2011)
  • Publisher: BioMed Central
  • Journal: BMC Public Health, volume 11, pages 419-419 (eissn: 1471-2458)
  • Related identifiers: doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-419, pmc: PMC3128022
  • Subject: Research Article | qy_4 | wa_110 | wc_503_6 | Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Background: In Liverpool, injecting drug users (IDUs), men-who-have-sex-with-men (MSM) and UK Africans experience a disproportionate burden of HIV, yet services do not reach out to these groups and late presentations continue. We set out to: increase testing uptake in targeted marginalized groups through a community and genitourinary medicine (GUM)-based point of care testing (POCT) programme; and conduct a process evaluation to examine service provider inputs and document service user perceptions of the programme.\ud Methods: Mixed quantitative, qualitative and process evaluation methods were used. Service providers were trained to use fourth generation rapid antibody/antigen HIV tests. Existing outreach services incorporated POCT into routine practice. Clients completed a semi-structured questionnaire and focus group discussions (FGDs) were\ud held with service providers.\ud Results: Between September 2009 and June 2010, 953 individuals underwent POCT (GUM: 556 [59%]; communitybased\ud sites: 397 [42%]). Participants in the community were more likely to be male (p = 0.028), older (p < 0.001), of UK African origin (p < 0.001) and IDUs (p < 0.001) than participants from the GUM clinic. Seventeen new HIV diagnoses were confirmed (prevalence = 1.8%), 16 of whom were in risk exposure categories (prevalence: 16/517,\ud 3.1%). Questionnaires and FGDs showed that clients and service providers were supportive of POCT, highlighting\ud benefits of reaching out to marginalised communities and incorporating HIV prevention messages.\ud Conclusions: Community and GUM clinic-based POCT for HIV was feasible and acceptable to clients and service\ud providers in a low prevalence setting. It successfully reached target groups, many of whom would not have\ud otherwise tested. We recommend POCT be considered among strategies to increase the uptake of HIV testing\ud among groups who are currently underserved.
  • References (27)
    27 references, page 1 of 3

    1. British HIV Association HIV: British Association for Sexual Health & HIV and British Infection Society. UK National Guidelines for HIV Testing 2008.

    2. Poljak M, Smit E, Ross J: 2008 European Guideline on HIV testing. Int J STD AIDS 2009, 20:77-83.

    3. Branson BM, Handsfield HH, Lampe MA, Janssen RS, Taylor AW, Lyss SB, Clark JE, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): Revised recommendations for HIV testing of adults, adolescents, and pregnant women in health-care settings. MMWR Recomm Rep 2006, 55:1-17, quiz CE1-4.

    4. Health Protection Agency UK: HIV in the United Kingdom: 2009 Report. 2009.

    5. Burns FM, Fakoya AO, Copas AJ, French PD: Africans in London continue to present with advanced HIV disease in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy. AIDS 2001, 15:2453-5.

    6. Burns FM, Johnson AM, Nazroo J, Ainsworth J, Anderson J, Fakoya A, Fakoya I, Hughes A, Jungmann E, Sadiq ST, Sullivan AK, Fenton KA: SONHIA Collaboration Group. Missed opportunities for earlier HIV diagnosis within primary and secondary healthcare settings in the UK. AIDS 2008, 22:115-22.

    7. Health Protection Agency: Shooting Up: Infections among injecting drug users in the United Kingdom 2007. 2008, An update October 2008.

    8. Marum E, Taegtmeyer M, Chebet K: Scale-up of voluntary HIV counseling and testing in Kenya. JAMA 2006, 296:859-62.

    9. Piot P, Bartos M, Larson H, Zewdie D, Mane P: Coming to terms with complexity: a call to action for HIV prevention. Lancet 2008, 372:845-59.

    10. Chadborn , Delpech , Sabin , Sinka , Evans : The late diagnosis and consequent short-term mortality of HIV-infected hetrosexuals (England and Wales 2000-2004). AIDS 2006, 20:2371-9.

  • Related Research Results (1)
  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark