Argumentation meets adapted cognition: manipulation in media discourse on immigration

Article English OPEN
Hart, Christopher (2013)

Critical discourse analysis has focussed extensively on argumentation in anti-immigration discourse where a specific suite of argumentation strategies has been identified as constitutive of the discourse. The successful perlocutionary effects of these arguments are analysed as products of pragmatic processes based on ‘common-sense’ reasoning schemes known as topoi. In this paper, I offer an alternative explanation grounded in cognitive-evolutionary psychology. Specifically, it is shown that a number of argumentation schemes identified as recurrent in anti-immigration discourse relate to two cognitive mechanisms proposed in evolutionary psychology: the cheater detection and avoidance mechanism (Cosmides 1989) and epistemic vigilance (Sperber et al. 2010). It is further suggested that the potential perlocutionary effects of argument acts in anti-immigration discourse, in achieving sanction for discriminatory practices, may arise not as the product of intentional-inferential processes but as a function of cognitive heuristics and biases provided by these mechanisms. The impact of such arguments may therefore be best characterised in terms of manipulation rather than persuasion.
  • References (49)
    49 references, page 1 of 5

    Barrett, L., R. Dunbar and J. Lycett (2002). Human evolutionary psychology. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

    Chilton, P. (2005a). Missing links in mainstream CDA: Modules, blends and the critical instinct. In R. Wodak and P. Chilton (eds.), A new agenda in (critical) discourse analysis: Theory, methodology and interdisciplinarity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp. 19-52.

    Cosmides, L. (1989). The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task. Cognition 31: 187-276.

    Cosmides, L. and J. Tooby (1992). Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. In J. Barkow, L. Cosmides and J. Tooby (eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 162-228.

    Cosmides, L. and J. Tooby. (1997). Evolutionary psychology: A primer. Retrieved 20 June, 2008, http://www.psych.ucsb.edu/research/cep/primer.html.

    Cosmides, L. and J. Tooby (2000). Evolutionary psychology and the emotions. In M. Lewis and M. J. Haviland-Jones (eds.), Handbook of emotions, 2nd edn. New York: Guilford Press. pp. 91-115.

    Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes' error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Putnam.

    de Saussure, L. and P. Schulz (eds.) (2005). Manipulation and ideologies in the twentieth century: Discourse, language, mind. Amsterdam: John Benjamin

    Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London: Longman.

    Fodor, J. (1983). The modularity of mind: An essay on faculty psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Metrics
    0
    views in OpenAIRE
    0
    views in local repository
    286
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    Northumbria Research Link - IRUS-UK 0 286
Share - Bookmark