Emergency readmission criterion: a technique for determining emergency readmission time window

Article English OPEN
Demir, Eren ; Chaussalet, Thierry J. ; Xie, Haifeng ; Millard, Peter H.

A frequently chosen time window in defining readmission is 28 days after discharge. Yet in the literature, shorter and longer periods such as 14 days or 90-180 days have also been suggested. In this paper, we develop a modeling approach that systematically tackles the issue surrounding the appropriate choice of a time window as a definition of readmission. The approach is based on the intuitive idea that patients who are discharged from hospital can be broadly divided in to two groups-a group that is at high risk of readmission and a group that is at low risk. Using the national data (England), we demonstrate the usefulness of the approach in the case of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), stroke, and congestive heart failure (CHF) patients, which are known to be the leading causes of early readmission. Our findings suggest that there are marked differences in the optimal width of the time window for COPD, stroke, and CHF patients. Furthermore, time windows and the probabilities of being in the high-risk group for COPD, stroke, and CHF patients for each of the 29 acute and specialist trusts in the London area indicate wide variability between hospitals. The novelty of this modeling approach lies in its ability to define an appropriate time window based on evidence objectively derived from operational data. Therefore, it can separately provide a unique approach in examining variability between hospitals, and potentially contribute to a better definition of readmission as a performance indicator.
  • References (20)
    20 references, page 1 of 2

    [1] S. Capewell, “Stemming the tide of readmissions: Patient, practice or practitioner?” Br. Med. J., vol. 312, pp. 991-992, 1996.

    [2] J. Brown and C. S. Gray, “The continuing rise in emergency admissions,” Rev. Clin. Gerontol., vol. 8, pp. 173-181, 1998.

    [3] Healthcare Commission. (2005). Performance Ratings [Online]. Available: http://ratings2005.healthcarecommission.org.uk (accessed Feb. 2, 2007).

    [4] M. C. Benbassat, H. D. Kuykendall, L. M. Johnson, P. N. Wray, and L. Wu, “The association between the quality of inpatient care and early readmission,” Ann. Internal Med., vol. 122, pp. 415-421, 1995.

    [5] D. W. Sibbritt, “Validation of a 28 day interval between discharge and readmission for emergency readmission rates,” J. Qual. Clin. Pract., vol. 15, pp. 211-220, 1995.

    [6] M. Chambers and A. Clarke, “Measuring readmission rates,” Br. Med. J., vol. 301, pp. 1134-1136, 1990.

    [7] J. Corrigan and J. Martin, “Identification of factors associated with hospital readmission and development of a predictive model,” Health Serv. Res., vol. 27, pp. 81-101, 1992.

    [8] E. Williams and F. Fitton, “Factors affecting early unplanned readmission of elderly patients to hospital,” Br. Med. J., vol. 297, pp. 784-787, 1988.

    [9] E. Demir, T. J. Chaussalet, H. Xie, and P. H. Millard, “A Method for determining an emergency readmission time window for better patient management,” in Proc. 19th IEEE Symp. CBMS, 2006, pp. 789-793.

    [10] C. Luthi, B. Burnard, M. McClellan, R. Pitts, and D. Flanders, “Is readmission to hospital an indicator of poor process of care for patients with heart failure?,” Br. Med. J., vol. 13, pp. 46-51, 2003.

  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    WestminsterResearch - IRUS-UK 0 33
Share - Bookmark