Fetal gene therapy: Balancing ethical theory, scientific progress and the rights of others

0044 English OPEN
Childs, Richardo;
  • Subject: BJ | H1 | QH426

This thesis examines the relationship between rights and duties in the field of fetal gene therapy and assesses if the current regulatory position within England and Wales is compatible with the intergenerational aspects of scientific progress within fetal gene therapy ... View more
  • References (5)

    Re R (A Minor) (Wardship: Consent to Treatment) [1992] Fam 11 CA .....66, 67, 151 Re S (adult: refusal of medical treatment) [1992] 4 All ER671 ................................83 Re T (Adult: Refusal of Treatment) [1993] Fam 95 .................66, 67, 81, 82, 219, 247 Re W (A Minor) (Wardship: Consent to treatment) [1993] Fam 64 ..........................67 Re Y (Mental Patient: Bone Marrow Donation) [1996] 2 FLR 787 ........................277 Roe v Wade 410 U.S. 113 (1973)...........................................................................8, 20 Sidaway v Governor of the Bethlem Royal Hospital [1985] 1 A.C 871 ..................138 Tameside and Glossop Acute Services Trust v CH (a patient) [1996] 1 FLR 762 ....83 Utah v. Rowland, No. 041901649 (Utah Dist. Ct.-3d Apr. 7, 2004) ...............192, 251 Vo v France (Application no. 53924/00). (2004) 79 BMLR 71..85, 87, 88, 146, 173, 243

    W v Edgell [1990] Ch 359..........................................................................................59 Wackenheim v France CCPR/75/D/854/1999 .................................................148, 238 Whitner v South Carolina 492 S.E. 2d 777 (S.C. 1997) ..................................192, 251 X v. United Kingdom (Application no. 8416/79, Commission decision of 13 May 1980) ......................................................................................................................88 Z v Finland (1997) 25 EHRR 371..............................................................................59 Code of Federal Regulations: Title 45 - Public welfare, Part 46, Protection of Human Subjects ..............................................................................................................2, 75 Human Embryology and Fertilisation Bill 2008 ........................................................95 Schneider, H. and Coutelle, C. (1999). In utero gene therapy: The case for. Nature Medicine 5(3), pp. 256-257.

    Schulman, A. (2005). Staff Working Paper: Bioethics and Human Dignity. Available at: http://bioethicsprint.bioethics.gov/background/human_dignity.html [Accessed: 9th February 2010].

    Vrijheid, M., Dolk, H. et al. (2000). Socioeconomic inequalities in risk of congenital anomaly. Archives of Disease in Childhood 82, pp. 349-352.

    Wagner, A., Schoeberlein, A. et al. (2008). Fetal gene therapy: Opportunities and risk. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 61pp. 813-821.

  • Related Organizations (3)
  • Metrics
Share - Bookmark