A model-based comparison of three theories of audiovisual temporal recalibration

Article English OPEN
Yarrow, K. ; Minaei, S. ; Arnold, D. H. (2015)

Observers change their audio-visual timing judgements after exposure to asynchronous audiovisual signals. The mechanism underlying this temporal recalibration is currently debated. Three broad explanations have been suggested. According to the first, the time it takes for sensory signals to propagate through the brain has changed. The second explanation suggests that decisional criteria used to interpret signal timing have changed, but not time perception itself. A final possibility is that a population of neurones collectively encode relative times, and that exposure to a repeated timing relationship alters the balance of responses in this population. Here, we simplified each of these explanations to its core features in order to produce three corresponding six-parameter models, which generate contrasting patterns of predictions about how simultaneity judgements should vary across four adaptation conditions: No adaptation, synchronous adaptation, and auditory leading/lagging adaptation. We tested model predictions by fitting data from all four conditions simultaneously, in order to assess which model/explanation best described the complete pattern of results. The latency-shift and criterion-change models were better able to explain results for our sample as a whole. The population-code model did, however, account for improved performance following adaptation to a synchronous adapter, and best described the results of a subset of observers who reported least instances of synchrony.
  • References (17)
    17 references, page 1 of 2

    <INSERT FIGURE 5 AROUND HERE>

    <INSERT TABLES 1-3 AROUND HERE>

    O'Neill, R. (1971). Algorithm AS 47: Function minimization using a simplex procedure. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 20(3), 338-345.

    Roach, N. W., Heron, J., Whitaker, D., & McGraw, P. V. (2011). Asynchrony adaptation reveals neural population code for audio-visual timing. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278(1710), 1314-1322. doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.1737

    Roseboom, W., Kawabe, T., & Nishida, S. (2013). Audio-visual temporal recalibration can be constrained by content cues regardless of spatial overlap. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 189. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00189.

    Roseboom, W., & Arnold, D. H. (2011). Twice upon a time: Multiple concurrent temporal recalibrations of audiovisual speech. Psychological Science, 22(7), 872-877. doi:10.1177/0956797611413293

    Roseboom, W., Linares, D., & Nishida, S. (2015) Sensory adaptation for timing perception. Proceedings of the Royal Society series B, 282: 20142833. doi:10.1098/rspb.2014.2833

    Rosenberger, W. F., & Grill, S. E. (1997). A sequential design for psychophysical experiments: An application to estimating timing of sensory events. Statistics in Medicine, 16(19), 2245-2260.

    Sternberg, S., & Knoll, R. L. (1973). The perception of temporal order: Fundamental issues and a general model. In S. Kornblum (Ed.), Attention and performance IV (pp. 629-686). London: Academic Press.

    Stetson, C., Cui, X., Montague, P. R., & Eagleman, D. M. (2006). Motor-sensory recalibration leads to an illusory reversal of action and sensation. Neuron, 51(5), 651-659.

  • Metrics
    0
    views in OpenAIRE
    0
    views in local repository
    32
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    City Research Online - IRUS-UK 0 32
Share - Bookmark