Stimuli were presented in which values of an outcome variable for a single individual were recorded over\ud 24 time periods, and an intervention was introduced at one of the time periods. Participants judged\ud whether and how much the intervention affected the outcome.... View more
Ahn, W., Kalish, C. W., Medin, D. L., & Gelman, S. A. (1995). The role of covariation versus mechanism information in causal attribution. Cognition, 54, 299-352.
Allan, L. G. (1993). Human contingency judgements: Rule based or associative? Psychological Bulletin, 114, 435-448.
Allan, L. G., Hannah, S. D., Crump, M. J. C., & Siegel, S. (2008). The psychophysics of contingency assessment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 226-243.
Box, G. E., Jenkins, G. M., & Reinsel, G. C. (2008). Time series analysis: Forecasting and control (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Bühner, M. J., Cheng, P. W., & Clifford, D. (2003). From covariation to causation: A test of the assumption of causal power. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 1119-1140.
Bühner, M. J., & May, J. (2002). Knowledge mediates the timeframe of covariation assessment in human causal induction. Thinking and Reasoning, 8, 269-295.
Bühner, M. J., & May, J. (2003). Rethinking temporal contiguity and the judgment of causality: Effects of prior knowledge, experience, and reinforcement procedure. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56A, 865-890.
Bühner, M. J., & May, J. (2004). Abolishing the effect of reinforcement delay on human causal learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57B, 179-191.
Bühner, M. J., & McGregor, S. (2006). Temporal delays can facilitate causal attribution: Towards a general timeframe bias in causal induction. Thinking and Reasoning, 12, 353-378.
Chatfield, C. (2004). The analysis of time series: An introduction (6th ed.). London: Chapman and Hall.