A Decision Aid Intervention to Improve Decisions about Weight Management Referral in Primary Care: Development and Feasibility Study

Article English OPEN
Brown, I. ; Deighton, M. (2013)
  • Publisher: OMICS International

Patient non-attendance after referral to weight management support is a problem in routine health care. The decision making process prior to referral is a useful focus for research. The present study aimed to develop a patient decision aid intervention and to investigate patient and clinician perspectives on its acceptability and implementation in primary care. The content of a decision aid booklet was developed following in-depth interviews with 52 adults (mean age 56 years; 26 women, 26 men). The content was refined within a study of patients (n=21, 15 women) and clinicians (n=45) comprising doctors (n=12), nurses (n=15) and allied professions (n=18). An exploratory study of implementation was undertaken in primary care with feedback obtained from 18 patients (mean age 52 years; 12 women) and 5 nurses in relation to weight review consultations. Study findings show the weight management decision process is potentially complex and challenging to patients for both cognitive and social reasons. A decision aid developed to address patient needs was liked by patients and, to a lesser extent, by clinicians. The intervention was viewed as acceptable and feasible for implementation into routine practice. Active ingredients within a complex intervention appeared to be improvements in cognitive processing for patients but also improvements in rapport between patient and clinician. Further research should now evaluate outcomes including consultation rapport and patient attendance.
  • References (48)
    48 references, page 1 of 5

    1. (2000) Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 894: 1-253.

    2. Government Office for Science: Foresight (2007) Tackling Obesities: Future Choices. Department of Innovation, London, UK.

    3. NHS Information Centre (2012) Statistics on Obesity, Physical Activity and Diet in England. The Health and Social Care Information Centre, London, England.

    4. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) (2006) Obesity: Guidance on the prevention, identification, assessment and management of overweight and obesity in adults and children. NICE, London, England.

    5. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) (2010) Management of obesity: A national clinical guideline. SIGN, Edinburgh, Scotland.

    6. National Institutes of Health & NHLBI (1998) Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults - the evidence report. Obes Research 6: 1-209.

    7. HM Government (2008). Healthy weight healthy lives: A cross government strategy for England. Department of Health, London, England.

    8. Wass J, Finer N (2013) Action on obesity: comprehensive care for all. Clin Med 13: 4-5.

    9. Douketis JD, Macie C, Thabane L, Williamson DF (2005) Systematic review of long-term weight loss studies in obese adults: clinical significance and applicability to clinical practice. Int J Obes (Lond) 29: 1153-1167.

    10. Loveman E, Frampton GK, Shepherd J, Picot J, Cooper K, et al. (2011) The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of long-term weight management schemes for adults: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess 15: 1-182.

  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    White Rose Research Online - IRUS-UK 0 18
Share - Bookmark