Attitudes to Voting Rules and Electoral System Preferences:Evidence from the 1999 and 2003 Scottish Parliament Elections

Article English OPEN
Curtice, John ; Seyd, Ben (2011)

Publication based on research carried out in the framework of the European Union Democracy Observatory (EUDO) of the Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, European University Institute. The journal issue has been produced in the framework of the PIREDEU Project, one of the projects carried out by the EUDO Public Opinion Observatory. Researchers have paid little attention to the way citizens evaluate different electoral systems. This reflects the limited knowledge citizens are presumed to have about alternative electoral arrangements. However, the establishment of a legislature under new electoral rules creates conditions in which citizens can make more informed judgements. Such a situation occurred with the establishment of the Scottish Parliament in 1999, elected under the Additional Member system. Using data collected in 1999 and 2003, we consider Scottish voters’ reactions to the new electoral rules. We examine how voters evaluated various features and outcomes of the rules, the structure of voters’ attitudes, and which features and outcomes of the rules were decisive in shaping overall support for plurality and proportional voting systems. 1. Citizens and electoral rules 2. Research questions 3. Debates about electoral systems 4. Data and measures 5. Results 6. Conclusion Acknowledgements Appendix 1 Question wording and coding of variables Dependent variables Endogenous variables Allocation
  • References (62)
    62 references, page 1 of 7

    Amy, D.J., 1993. Real Choices/New Voices: The Case for Proportional Representation Elections in the United States. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Anderson, C.J., 1998. Parties, party systems and satisfaction with democratic performance in the new Europe. Political Studies 46 (3), 572-588.

    Anderson, C.J., Blais, A., Bowler, S., Donovan, T. and Listhaug, O., 2005. Losers’ Consent: Elections and Democratic Legitimacy. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Banducci, S.A., and Karp, J.A., 1999. Perceptions of fairness and support for proportional representation. Political Behavior 21 (3), 217-238.

    Blais, A., and Carty, R.K., 1990. Does proportional representation foster voter turnout?. European Journal of Political Research 18 (2), 167-81.

    Blau, A., 2004. Fairness and electoral reform. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 6 (2), 165-81.

    Bogdanor, V., 1984. What is Proportional Representation? Martin Robertson, Oxford.

    Bowler, S., and Donovan. T., 2007. Reasoning about institutional change: winners, losers and support for electoral reform. British Journal of Political Science 37 (3), 455-476.

    Bowler, S., Farrell, D.M., and Pettitt, R.T., 2005. Expert opinion on electoral systems: so which electoral system is 'best'? Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 15 (1), 3-20.

    Bromley, C., Curtice, J., McCrone, D. and Park, A., (Eds.) 2006. Has Devolution Delivered? Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark