A paycheck half-empty or half-full? Framing, fairness and progressive taxation

Article, Research English OPEN
Reimers, S. (2009)
  • Publisher: ESRC Centre for Economic Learning and Social Evolution
  • Journal: Judgment and Decision Making (vol: 4, pp: 461-466)
  • Subject: BF | tax, framing, psychology, judgment, heuristics, biases. | tax, framing, psychology, judgment, heuristics, biases, PSYCHOLOGY, ATTITUDES, DECISION, POLICIES, TAX | Tax, framing, psychology, judgment, heuristics, biases
    mesheuropmc: health care economics and organizations

Taxation policy is driven by many factors, including public opinion, but little research has examined the strength and stability of the public's taxation preferences. This paper demonstrates one way in which preferences for progressiveness depend on the framing of the question asked. Participants indicated how they would share a fixed tax burden between two individuals who earned different amounts of money, either by adjusting the amount of tax paid by the two individuals, or by adjusting the amount of post-tax income retained. The units in which tax was described --- amount of money or percentage tax rate --- were manipulated orthogonally. There was a strong metric effect : Participants favored progressiveness more when tax was described as a percentage rather than amount. However, there was also a clear interaction: for amounts, participants favored progressiveness significantly more when considering post-tax money retained rather than tax paid; for percentages, no such effect was found.
  • References (15)
    15 references, page 1 of 2

    Alpizar, F., Carlsson, F., & Johansson-Stenman, O. (2005). How much do we care about absolute versus relative income and consumption? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 56, 405-421.

    De Martino, B., Kumaran, D., Seymour, B., et al. (2006). Frames, biases, and rational decision-making in the human brain, Science, 313, 684-687.

    Edlund, J. (2003). Attitudes towards taxation: Ignorant and incoherent? Scandinavian Political Studies, 26, 145-167.

    Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.

    Keen, M., Kim, Y., & Varsano, R. (2008). The “flat tax(es)”: principles and experience. International Tax and Public Finance, 15, 712-751.

    Kirchler, E. (2007). The economic psychology of tax behaviour. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Lewis, A. (1978). Perceptions of tax rates. British Tax Review, 6, 358-366.

    McCaffery, E. J. & Baron, J. (2004). Framing and taxation: Evaluation of tax policies involving household composition, Journal of Economic Psychology, 25, 679-705.

    McCaffery, E. J. & Baron, J. (2005). The political psychology of redistribution, UCLA Law Review, 52, 1745-1792.

    McCaffery, E. J. & Baron, J. (2006a). Thinking about tax, Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 12, 106-135.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark