Particularism in Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics

Article English OPEN
Leibowitz, Uri D.
  • Publisher: Brill

In this essay I offer a new particularist reading of Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics. I argue\ud that the interpretation I present not only helps us to resolve some puzzles about Aristotle’s goals and\ud methods, but it also gives rise to a novel account of morality—an account that is both interesting and\ud plausible in its own right. The goal of this paper is, in part, exegetical—that is, to figure out how to best understand the text of the Nicomachean Ethics. But this paper also aims to contribute to the current\ud exciting and controversial debate over particularism. By taking the first steps towards a comprehensive\ud particularist reading of Aristotle’s Ethics I hope to demonstrate that some of the mistrust of\ud particularism is misplaced and that what is, perhaps, the most influential moral theory in the history of\ud philosophy is, arguably, a particularist moral theory.
  • References (11)
    11 references, page 1 of 2

    Broadie, S., (2006) 'Aristotle and Contemporary Ethics,' in Kraut (2006) pp. 342-361

    ------ (1991) Ethics with Aristotle (Oxford University Press)

    Burnyeat, M. F., (1980) 'Aristotle on Learning to be Good,' in Rorty (1980) pp. 69-92

    Crisp, R., (2007) 'Ethics Without Reasons?,' Journal of Moral Philosophy, 4(1):40-49

    Cruzer, H.J., (1996) 'Aristotle's Bad Advice about Becoming Good,' Philosophy 71:139-146

    Cullity, G., (2002) 'Particularism and Presumptive Reasons,' Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, suppl. vol. 76:169-190

    Dancy, J., (2004) Ethics Without Principles (Oxford: Clarendon Press)

    ------ (1993) Moral Reasons (Blackwell Publishers)

    ------ (1983) 'Ethical Particularism and Morally Relevant Properties,' Mind, 92:530-547

    Holton, R., (2002) 'Principles and Particularisms,' Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, suppl. vol. 76:191-210

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark