On robustness against JPEG2000: a performance evaluation of wavelet-based watermarking techniques

Article English OPEN
Bhowmik, Deepayan ; Abhayaratne, Charith (2014)

With the emergence of new scalable coding standards, such as JPEG2000, multimedia is stored as scalable coded bit streams that may be adapted to cater network, device and usage preferences in multimedia usage chains providing universal multimedia access. These adaptations include quality, resolution, frame rate and region of interest scalability and achieved by discarding least significant parts of the bit stream according to the scalability criteria. Such content adaptations may also affect the content protection data, such as watermarks, hidden in the original content. Many wavelet-based robust watermarking techniques robust to such JPEG2000 compression attacks are proposed in the literature. In this paper, we have categorized and evaluated the robustness of such wavelet-based image watermarking techniques against JPEG2000 compression, in terms of algorithmic choices, wavelet kernel selection, subband selection, or watermark selection using a new modular framework. As most of the algorithms use a different set of parametric combination, this analysis is particularly useful to understand the effect of various parameters on the robustness under a common platform and helpful to design any such new algorithm. The analysis also considers the imperceptibility performance of the watermark embedding, as robustness and imperceptibility are two main watermarking properties, complementary to each other.
  • References (43)
    43 references, page 1 of 5

    1. D. S. Taubman and M. W. Marcellin, JPEG2000 Image Compression Fundamentals, Standards and Practice. USA: Springer, 2002.

    2. H. Schwarz, D. Marpe, and T. Wiegand, “Overview of the scalable video coding extension of the H.264/AVC standard,” IEEE Trans. Circ. and Syst. for Video Tech, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 1103-1120, Sept. 2007.

    3. S. Kandadai and C. D. Creusere, “Scalable audio compression at low bitrates,” IEEE Trans. Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 969-979, July 2008.

    4. I. Burnett, R. V. de Walle, K. Hill, J. Bormans, and F. Pereira, “MPEG-21: goals and achievements,” IEEE Multimedia, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 60-70, Oct.-Dec. 2003.

    5. A. Vetro, “MPEG-21 digital item adaptation: enabling universal multimedia access,” IEEE Multimedia, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 84-87, Jan.-March 2004.

    6. L. Xie and G. R. Arce, “Joint wavelet compression and authentication watermarking,” in Proc. IEEE ICIP, vol. 2, 1998, pp. 427-431.

    7. F. Huo and X. Gao, “A wavelet based image watermarking scheme,” in Proc. IEEE ICIP, 2006, pp. 2573-2576.

    8. H. Tao, J. Liu, and J. Tian, “Digital watermarking technique based on integer Harr transforms and visual properties,” in Proc. SPIE Image Compression and Encryption Tech., vol. 4551-1, 2001, pp. 239-244.

    9. X. Xia, C. G. Boncelet, and G. R. Arce, “Wavelet transform based watermark for digital images,” Optic Express, vol. 3, no. 12, pp. 497-511, Dec. 1998.

    10. G. Al-Hudhud, “Adaptation of HVS Sensitivity for Perceptual Modelling of Wavelet-Based Image Compression,” in Proc. Second Int'l Conf. in Visualisation, 2009, pp. 196-200.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark