Co-designing Possible Flooding Solutions : Participatory Mapping Methods to Identify Flood Management Options from a UK Borders Case Study

Article English OPEN
Cinderby, Steven ; Forrester, John Martin (2016)

This paper reports on the findings developed by a funded project within the UK Rural Economy and Land Use Programme: ‘Managing borderlands: adaptive decision making amongst specialists and non-specialists’. The project focuses specifically on the development of a nested-scale participatory GIS (PGIS) method to identify spatially local perceptions and experiential knowledge of the risk and vulnerability of two catchments in the Scottish–English Borders. The method attempts to move beyond mapping risk towards the co-design of possible solutions. This will highlight the potential for improved inclusion of local perspectives on risk afforded by using PGIS mapping approaches in the UK context. The potential of the approach to generate co-designed community preferences leading to more resilient solutions (particularly in terms of social and economic consequences) to environmental change will also be discussed.
  • References (27)
    27 references, page 1 of 3

    Brabham, D.C., 2009. Crowdsourcing the Public Participation Process for Planning Projects. Planning Theory, 8(3), pp.242 262. Available at: http://plt.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/1473095209104824 [Accessed July 24, 2012].

    Catney, P. et al., 2013. Big society, little justice? Community renewable energy and the politics of localism. Local Environment, (May), pp.1 16. Available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13549839.2013.792044 [Accessed May 24, 2013].

    Chess, C. & Purcell, K., 1999. Policy Analysis Public Participation and the Environment : Do We Know What Works ? Environmental Science & Technology, (732), pp.2685 2692. -to- ory Geographic Information Systems (P-GIS) for inclusive urban design in UK cities. Area, 42(2), pp.239 251. Available at: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2009.00912.x [Accessed October 25, 2010].

    Cinderby, S., Snell, C. & Forrester, J., 2008. Participatory GIS and its application in governance: the example of air quality and the implications for noise pollution. Local Environment, 13(4), pp.309 320. Available at: http://www.informaworld.com/openurl?genre=article&doi=10.1080/13549830701803265&magi c=crossref||D404A21C5BB053405B1A640AFFD44AE3 [Accessed November 27, 2010].

    Cope, M. & Elwood, S., 2009. Qualitative GIS: A Mixed Methods Approach First. M. Cope & S. Elwood, eds., Sage.

    Cornwall, A., 2002. Locating citizen participation. IDS bulletin, Volume 33(Issue 2), pp.i x. Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2002.tb00016.x/abstract [Accessed June 7, 2013].

    Davies, G. & Dwyer, C., 2007. Qualitative methods II: minding the gap. Progress in Human Geography, 44(0), pp.1 11. Available at: http://phg.sagepub.com/content/early/2007/12/18/0309132507084403.full.pdf [Accessed August 22, 2013].

    Department for Communities and Local Government, 2011. A plain English guide to the Localism Bill,

    Goodchild, M.., 2007. Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal, pp.1 15. Available at: http://www.springerlink.com/index/h013jk125081j628.pdf [Accessed February 3, 2012].

    Goodchild, M.F., 2011. Virtual Geographic Environments as Collective Constructions. In H. Lin & M. Batty, eds. Virtual Geographic Environments. ESRI, pp. 15 24.

  • Similar Research Results (1)
  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark