The ghost in the machine? : the value of expert advice in the production of evidence-based guidance : a mixed methods study of the NICE Interventional Procedures Programme

Article English OPEN
Oyebode, Oyinlola; Patrick, Hannah; Walker, Alexander; Campbell, Bruce; Powell, John;
(2016)

Objectives: \ud The aim of this study was to determine the aspects of expert advice that decision makers find most useful in the development of evidence-based guidance and to identify the characteristics of experts providing the most useful advice.\ud \ud Methods: \ud F... View more
  • References (12)
    12 references, page 1 of 2

    5. Raine R, Sanderson C, Hutchings A, Carter S, Larkin K, Black N: An experimental study of determinants of group judgments in clinical guideline development. The Lancet, 2004, 364:429-437.

    6. Moreira T. Diversity in Clinical Guidelines: The role of repertoires of Evaluation. Social Science & Medicine, 2005, 60:1975-1985.

    7. Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP. Content area experts as authors: helpful or harmful for systematic reviews and meta-analyses? BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2012;345.

    8. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence: Intervention Procedures Programme Methods Guide. London; 2007.

    9. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence: Intervention Procedures Programme- Programme Manual. London; 2007.

    10. Goldenberg MJ. On evidence and evidence-based medicine: Lessons from the philosophy of science. Social Science & Medicine, 2006. 62:2621- 2632

    11. Berg M, Meulen RT, Van Den Burg M. Guidelines for appropriate care: the importance of empirical normative analysis. Health Care Anal, 2001. 9:77- 99.

    12. Gabbay J, le May A: Practice-based Evidence for Healthcare: Clinical Mindlines. Routledge; 2010.

    13."Jamous, H. and Peloille, B. (1970) Changes in the French universityhospital system." In Jackson J.A. (ed.) Professions and Professionalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    14.Stuebe AM: Level IV evidence- adverse anecdote and clinical practice. New England Journal of Medicine, 2011, 365(1):8-9.

  • Metrics
Share - Bookmark