Closed shop versus one stop shop: the battle goes on ('Wouters and others v. NOVA')

Article English OPEN
Berry, E (2002)
  • Publisher: Sweet & Maxwell/Thomson Reuters
  • References (11)
    11 references, page 1 of 2

    See, for example, the Canadian Bar Association Resolution 00-03-A Multi-Disciplinary Practices, (2000) August and Resolution 00-01-M Multi-Disciplinary Practices (2001) February, both at http://www.cba.org/; The Law Society of England and Wales Multi-Disciplinary Partnerships: Why? Why not? (1998) October, http://www.lawsociety.org.uk/dcs/third_tier.asp?section_id=893; The Association of Corporate Counsel of America Policy Statement of the Board of Directors on Multidisciplinary Partnerships (1999) 6 February http://www.acca.com/gcadvocate/multi.html and the Law Council of Australia (1999) Policy Statement on Multi-Disciplinary Partnerships http://www.lawcouncil.asn.au/mdppol.htm.

    ABA Commission on Multidisciplinary http://www.abanet.org/cpr/mdpfinalrep2000.html.

    See, for example, the Disney Corporation's rejection of a proposal to use the same firm to provide its auditing and consulting services (AccountingWEB “Disney to Split Audit and Consulting Firms Despite Shareholder OK” (2002) 21 February: www.accountingweb.co.uk).

    Jonathan Goldsmith quoted in J. Cahill “MDPs suffer European setback” (2002) 16(9) The Lawyer 2. See also the Note for the informal Ecofin Council at Oviedo 12 & 13 April 2002 and Accounting WEB “Audit Survey Enron--UK reactions and remedies” (2002) May http://www.accountingweb.co.uk which indicated that 49% of auditors and 54% of accountants in practice thought that the Enron collapse proved that auditors were too involved with their clients.

    Case C-41/90, Höfner and Elsner v. Macrotron [1991] E.C.R. I-1979; [1993] 4 C.M.L.R. 306, para. 21.

    Joined Cases C 180-184/98, Pavlov and others v. Stichting Pensioenfonds Medische Specialisten [2000] E.C.R. I-6451; [2001] 4 C.M.L.R. 30, para. 77.

    See, for example, Joined Cases 56 and 58/64, Établissements Consten SA and Grundig GmbH v. Commission [1966] E.C.R. 299; [1966] C.M.L.R. 418.

    See, for example, Decision 1999/152 [2000] O.J. L93/1, as amended by Regulation 1310/97 [1997] O.J. L180/1.

    See, for example, Case 8/72, Vereeniging van Cementhandelaren v. Commission [1972] E.C.R. 977; [1973] C.M.L.R. 7, para. 29.

    See the Law Society, op.cit. n. 1 and Multi-Disciplinary Partnerships: Proposals for the way forward (1999) 13 October, and the Law Society Multi Disciplinary Practice Working Party Multi-Disciplinary Practices: Interim Report (2000) 23 June, Multi-Disciplinary Practices: Third Interim Report (2000) 7 December, and Multi-Disciplinary Practices: Fourth Interim Report (2001) 15 March, all at http://www.lawsociety.org.uk/dcs/third tier.asp?section_id=3169&Caller_ID.

  • Metrics
    0
    views in OpenAIRE
    0
    views in local repository
    63
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    Institutional Repository - IRUS-UK 0 63
Share - Bookmark