Optimal control of ankle joint moment: Toward unsupported standing in paraplegia

Article English OPEN
Hunt, K.J. ; Munih, M. ; Donaldson, N. ; Barr, F.M.D. (1998)
  • Publisher: IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
  • Subject: R1

This paper considers part of the problem of how to provide unsupported standing for paraplegics by feedback control. In this work our overall objective is to stabilize the subject by stimulation only of his ankle joints while the other joints are braced, Here, we investigate the problem of ankle joint moment control. The ankle plantarflexion muscles are first identified with pseudorandom binary sequence (PRBS) signals, periodic sinusoidal signals, and twitches. The muscle is modeled in Hammerstein form as a static recruitment nonlinearity followed by a linear transfer function. A linear-quadratic-Gaussian (LQG)-optimal controller design procedure for ankle joint moment was proposed based on the polynomial equation formulation, The approach was verified by experiments in the special Wobbler apparatus with a neurologically intact subject, and these experimental results are reported. The controller structure is formulated in such a way that there are only two scalar design parameters, each of which has a clear physical interpretation. This facilitates fast controller synthesis and tuning in the laboratory environment. Experimental results show the effects of the controller tuning parameters: the control weighting and the observer response time, which determine closed-loop properties. Using these two parameters the tradeoff between disturbance rejection and measurement noise sensitivity can be straightforwardly balanced while maintaining a desired speed of tracking. The experimentally measured reference tracking, disturbance rejection, and noise sensitivity are good and agree with theoretical expectations.
  • References (36)
    36 references, page 1 of 4

    [1] L. A. Benton, L. L. Baker, B. R. Bowman, and R. L. Waters, “Functional electrical stimulation-A practical clinical guide,” Rancho Los Amigos Rehabilitation Engineering Center, Downey, CA, Tech. Rep., 1981.

    [2] A. Kantrowitz, “Electronic physiological aids,” Maimonides Hospital of Brooklyn, NY, Tech. Rep. 1963.

    [3] A. Kralj and T. Bajd, Functional Electrical Stimulation: Walking and Standing After Spinal Cord Injury. Florida: CRC, 1989.

    [4] D. J. Ewins, P. N. Taylor, S. E. Crook, R. T. Liczynski, and I. D. Swain, “Practical low cost sit/stand system for mid-thoracic paraplegics,” J. Biomed. Eng., vol. 10, pp. 184-188, 1988.

    [5] A. J. Mulder, H. B. K. Boom, H. J. Hermens, and G. Zilvold, “Artificialreflex stimulation for FES-induced standing with minimum quadriceps force,” Med. and Biol. Eng. and Comput., vol. 28, pp. 483-488, 1990.

    [6] D. N. Rushton, N. Donaldson, F. M. D. Barr, V. J. Harper, T. A. Perkins, P. N. Taylor, and A. M. Tromans, “Lumbar anterior root stimulator for lower limb control in paraplegia,” in Neuroprosthetics: From Basic Research to Clinical Application, A. Pedotti, M. Ferrarin, J. Quintern, and R. Riener, Eds. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1996.

    [7] H. M. Franken, P. H. Veltink, G. Baardman, R. A. Redmeyer, and H. B. K. Boom, “Cycle-by-cycle control of swing phase of paraplegic gait induced by surface electrical stimulation,” Med. Biol. Eng. Comput., vol. 33, pp. 440-451, 1995.

    [8] J. Quintern, R. Riener, and S. Rupprecht, “Comparison of simulation and experiments of different closed-loop strategies for FES-Part 2: Experiments in paraplegics,” in Proc. 5th Vienna Int. Workshop on Functional Electrostimulation, 1995, pp. 255-258.

    [9] P. E. Crago, M. Lemay, and L. Liu, “External control of limb movements involving environmental interactions,” in Multiple Muscle Systems: Biomechanics and Movement Organization, J. M. Winters and S. L. Woo, Eds. New York, Springer-Verlag, 1990.

    [10] J. T. Mortimer, “Motor prostheses,” in Handbook of Physiology-The Nervous System II, J. M. Brookhart, V. B. Mountcastle, V. B. Brooks, and S. R. Geiger, Eds. Bethesda, MD: American Physiological Soc., 1981, pp. 155-187.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark