The Single-Case Reporting Guideline In BEhavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016 Statement †

Article English OPEN
Tate, Robyn L. ; Perdices, Michael ; Rosenkoetter, Ulrike ; Shadish, William ; Vohra, Sunita ; Barlow, David H. ; Horner, Robert ; Kazdin, Alan ; Kratochwill, Thomas ; McDonald, Skye ; Sampson, Margaret ; Shamseer, Larissa ; Togher, Leanne ; Albin, Richard ; Backman, Catherine ; Douglas, Jacinta ; Evans, Jonathan J. ; Gast, David ; Manolov, Rumen ; Mitchell, Geoffrey ; Nickels, Lyndsey ; Nikles, Jane ; Ownsworth, Tamara ; Rose, Miranda ; Schmid, Christopher H. ; Wilson, Barbara (2016)

ABSTRACT We developed a reporting guideline to provide authors with guidance about what should be reported when writing a paper for publication in a scientific journal using a particular type of research design: the single-case experimental design. This report describes the methods used to develop the Single-Case Reporting guideline In BEhavioural interventions (SCRIBE) 2016. As a result of 2 online surveys and a 2-day meeting of experts, the SCRIBE 2016 checklist was developed, which is a set of 26 items that authors need to address when writing about single-case research. This article complements the more detailed SCRIBE 2016 Explanation and Elaboration article (Tate et al., 2016) that provides a rationale for each of the items and examples of adequate reporting from the literature. Both these resources will assist authors to prepare reports of single-case research with clarity, completeness, accuracy, and transparency. They will also provide journal reviewers and editors with a practical checklist against which such reports may be critically evaluated. We recommend that the SCRIBE 2016 is used by authors preparing manuscripts describing single-case research for publication, as well as journal reviewers and editors who are evaluating such manuscripts. SCIENTIFIC ABSTRACT Reporting guidelines, such as the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) Statement, improve the reporting of research in the medical literature (Turner et al., 2012). Many such guidelines exist and the CONSORT Extension to Nonpharmacological Trials (Boutron et al., 2008) provides suitable guidance for reporting between-groups intervention studies in the behavioural sciences. The CONSORT Extension for N-of-1 Trials (CENT 2015) was developed for multiple crossover trials with single individuals in the medical sciences (Shamseer et al., 2015; Vohra et al., 2015), but there is no reporting guideline in the CONSORT tradition for single-case research used in the behavioural sciences. We developed the Single-Case Reporting guideline In BEhavioural interventions (SCRIBE) 2016 to meet this need. This Statement article describes the methodology of the development of the SCRIBE 2016, along with the outcome of 2 Delphi surveys and a consensus meeting of experts. We present the resulting 26-item SCRIBE 2016 checklist. The article complements the more detailed SCRIBE 2016 Explanation and Elaboration article (Tate et al., 2016) that provides a rationale for each of the items and examples of adequate reporting from the literature. Both these resources will assist authors to prepare reports of single-case research with clarity, completeness, accuracy, and transparency. They will also provide journal reviewers and editors with a practical checklist against which such reports may be critically evaluated.
  • References (39)
    39 references, page 1 of 4

    Barker, J., McCarthy, P., Jones, M., & Moran, A. (2011). Single case research methods in sport and exercise psychology. London, United Kingdom: Routledge.

    Barker, J. B., Mellalieu, S. D., McCarthy, P. J., Jones, M. V., & Moran, A. (2013). A review of single-case research in sport psychology 1997-2012: Research trends and future directions. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 25, 4 -32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10413200.2012.709579

    Barlow, D. H., Nock, M. K., & Hersen, M. (2009). Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.

    Beeson, P. M., & Robey, R. R. (2006). Evaluating single-subject treatment research: Lessons learned from the aphasia literature. Neuropsychology Review, 16, 161-169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11065-006-9013-7

    Boutron, I., Moher, D., Altman, D. G., Schulz, K. F., & Ravaud, P., & the CONSORT Group. (2008). Extending the CONSORT Statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: Explanation and elaboration. Annals of Internal Medicine, 148, 295-309. http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/0003- 4819-148-4-200802190-00008

    Brewer, E. W. (2007). Delphi technique. In N. J. Salkind (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of measurement and statistics (Vol. 1, pp. 240 -246). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412952644.n128

    Didden, R., Korzilius, H., van Oorsouw, W., & Sturmey, P. (2006). Behavioral treatment of challenging behaviors in individuals with mild mental retardation: Meta-analysis of single-subject research. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 111, 290 -298. http://dx.doi.org/10.1352/0895-8017(2006)111 [290:btocbi]2.0.co;2

    Gast, D. L., & Ledford, J. R. (2014). Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Hammond, D., & Gast, D. L. (2010). Descriptive analysis of single subject research designs: 1983-2007. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 45, 187-202. http://www.jstor.org/stable/ 23879806

    Hitchcock, J. H., Horner, R. H., Kratochwill, T. R., Levin, J. R., Odom, S. L., Rindskopf, D. M., & Shadish, W. R. (2014). The What Works Clearinghouse single-case design pilot standards: Who will guard the guards? Remedial and Special Education, 35, 145-152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/ 0741932513518979

  • Metrics
    No metrics available