Online Two-Section PV Array Fault Diagnosis With Optimized Voltage Sensor Locations

Article English OPEN
Hu, Y ; Zhang, J ; Cao, W ; Wu, J ; Tian, GY ; Finney, SJ ; Kirtley, JL (2015)

Photovoltaic (PV) stations have been widely built in the world to utilize solar energy directly. In order to reduce the capital and operational costs, early fault diagnosis is playing an increasingly important role by enabling the long effective operation of PV arrays. This paper analyzes the terminal characteristics of faulty PV strings and arrays, and it develops a PV array fault diagnosis technique. The terminal current-voltage curve of a faulty PV array is divided into two sections, i.e., high-voltage and low-voltage fault diagnosis sections. The corresponding working points of healthy string modules and of healthy and faulty modules in an unhealthy string are then analyzed for each section. By probing into different working points, a faulty PV module can be located. The fault information is of critical importance for the maximum power point tracking and the array dynamical reconfiguration. Furthermore, the string current sensors can be eliminated, and the number of voltage sensors can be reduced by optimizing voltage sensor locations. Typical fault scenarios including monostring, multistring, and a partial shadow for a 1.6-kW 3 $times$ 3 PV array are presented and experimentally tested to confirm the effectiveness of the proposed fault diagnosis method.
  • References (39)
    39 references, page 1 of 4

    [1] Y. A. Mahmoud, W. Xiao, H. H. Zeineldin, “A parameterization approach for enhancing PV model accuracy,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 60, no.12, pp. 5708-5716, 2013.

    [2] B. N. Alajmi, K. H. Ahmed, S. J. Finney, B. W. Williams, “A maximum power point tracking technique for partially shaded photovoltaic systems in microgrids,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 1596-1606, April 2013.

    [3] L. Gao, R. A. Dougal, S. Liu, and A. P. Iotova, “Parallel-connected solar PV System to address partial and rapidly fluctuating shadow conditions,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 1548-1556, May 2009.

    [4] N Femia, G Petrone, G Spagnuolo, M Vitelli,” A technique for improving P&O MPPT performances of double-stage grid-connected photovoltaic systems,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 56, no. 11, pp. 4473-4482, Nov. 2009.

    [5] K. Ishaque, and Z. Salam, “A deterministic particle swarm optimization maximum power point tracker for photovoltaic system under partial shading condition,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 60, no. 8, pp. 3195- 3206, Aug. 2013.

    [6] M. Boztepe, F. Guinjoan, G. Velasco-Quesada, S. Silvestre, A. Chouder, E. Karatepe, “Global MPPT scheme for photovoltaic string inverters based on restricted voltage window search algorithm,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 61, no. 7, pp. 3302-3312, Jul. 2014.

    [7] K. Ding, X. Bian, H. Liu, T. Peng, “A MATLAB-Simulink-based PV module model and its application under conditions of nonuniform irradiance,” IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 864-872, Dec. 2012.

    [8] G Petrone, G Spagnuolo, M Vitelli, “Analytical model of mismatched photovoltaic fields by means of Lambert W-function,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 91 no. 18, pp. 1652-1657, Nov. 2007.

    [9] Y. Hu, Y. Deng, Q. Liu, X. He, “Asymmetry three-level grid-connected current hysteresis control with varying bus voltage and virtual over-sample method,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 3214-3222, Jun. 2014.

    [10] Y. Liu, B. Ge, H. Abu-Rub, and F. Z. Peng, “An effective control method for three-phase quasi-Z-source cascaded multilevel inverter based grid-tie photovoltaic power system,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 61, no. 12, pp. 6794-6802, Dec. 2014.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark