The Effect of a Second Runner on Pacing Strategy and RPE During a Running Time Trial

Article English OPEN
Bath, Deryn ; Turner, Louise ; Bosch, Andrew ; Tucker, Ross ; Lambert, Estelle ; Thompson, Kevin ; St Clair Gibson, Alan (2012)
  • Publisher: Human Kinetics
  • Subject: C600
    mesheuropmc: human activities

The aim of this study was to examine performance, pacing strategy and perception of effort during a 5-km time-trial while running with or without the presence of another athlete. \ud \ud Eleven non-elite male athletes participated in five 5-km time trials; two self-paced, maximal effort trials performed at the start (TT1) and end (TT2) of the study, and three trials performed in the presence of a second runner. In the three trials, the second runner ran either in front of the subject (Fast paced trial, FPT), behind the subject (Slow paced trial, SPT), or next to the subject (Equal paced trial, EPT). Performance times, heart rate, RPE, and a subjective assessment of the effect of the second runner on the athlete's performance were recorded during each of the trials. \ud \ud There was no significant difference in performance times, heart rate or RPE between any of the five trials. Running speed declined from the 1st to the 4th kilometre and then increased for the last kilometre in all five trials. Following the completion of all trials, nine of the eleven subjects perceived it to be easier to complete the 5-km time-trial with another runner in comparison to running alone. \ud \ud While the athletes perceived their performance to be improved by the presence of another runner, their pacing strategy, running speed, heart rate and RPE were not significantly altered. These findings indicate that an athlete's subconscious pacing strategy is robust and is not altered by the presence of another runner.
  • References (33)
    33 references, page 1 of 4

    1. Foster C, Schrager M, Snyder AC, Thompson NN. Pacing strategy and athletic performance. Sports Med. 1994;17(2):77-85.

    2. Ulmer HV. Concept of an extracellular regulation of muscular metabolic rate during heavy exercise in humans by psychophysiological feedback. Experientia. 1996;52(5):416-420.

    3. St Clair Gibson A, Lambert EV, Rauch LH, et al. The role of information processing between the brain and peripheral physiological systems in pacing and perception of effort. Sports Med. 2006;36(8):705-722.

    4. Tucker R, Noakes TD. The physiological regulation of pacing strategy during exercise: a critical review. Br J Sports Med. 2009;43(6):e1.

    5. Ansley L, Schabort E, St Clair Gibson A, Lambert MI, Noakes TD. Regulation of pacing strategies during successive 4-km time trials. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36(10):1819-1825.

    6. Nikolopoulos V, Arkinstall MJ, Hawley JA. Pacing strategy in simulated cycle time-trials is based on perceived rather than actual distance. J Sci Med Sport. 2001;4(2):212- 219.

    7. Noakes TD, St Clair Gibson A, Lambert EV. From catastrophe to complexity: a novel model of integrative central neural regulation of effort and fatigue during exercise in humans: summary and conclusions. Br J Sports Med. 2005;39(2):120-124.

    8. Mauger AR, Jones AM, Williams CA. Influence of feedback and prior experience on pacing during a 4-km cycle time trial. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41(2):451-458.

    9. St Clair Gibson A, Baden DA, Lambert MI, et al. The conscious perception of the sensation of fatigue. Sports Med. 2003;33(3):167-176.

    10. Baden DA, McLean TL, Tucker R, Noakes TD, St Clair Gibson A. Effect of anticipation during unknown or unexpected exercise duration on rating of perceived exertion, affect, and physiological function. Br J Sports Med. 2005;39(10):742-746, discussion 742-746.

  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    Northumbria Research Link - IRUS-UK 0 139
Share - Bookmark