Cryptic journalism: News reporting of encryption.

Article English OPEN
Thorsen, Einar (2017)

In light of Edward Snowden’s global surveillance disclosures, this article examines news discourses about online communication security and surveillance circumvention practices. It analyses 1249 news reports mentioning encryption in The Guardian and The New York Times, covering a three-year period from June 2012 to June 2015 (one year before and two years after the Snowden revelations). Whilst there was a marked increase in the volume of news articles mentioning encryption post-Snowden, the context in which encryption is discussed has since shifted from an initial emphasis on “surveillance” towards “security” issues. However, the research found that greater news coverage of encryption did not necessarily mean an increase in depth of coverage, with most mentions of encryption vague and non-descript. In terms of source usage, the research finds an emphasis on private corporations in both publications analysed. This is problematic when many of the organisations allowed to speak on encryption were those accused of colluding with the US and UK Governments to aid covert mass surveillance—the likes of Google, Facebook, Apple, Microsoft and so forth—thus providing them with a platform to exonerate themselves from the accusations. This contradictory depiction of communication security serves the status quo and prevents advancement of the “encrypted by default” communication practice called for by Snowden. This, by extension, has serious implications for both journalistic freedom and civil liberties since it helps to perpetuate the ability of nation states and corporations to conduct indiscriminate mass surveillance.
  • References (26)
    26 references, page 1 of 3

    Bakir, Vian, and Andrew McStay. 2016. “Assessing interdisciplinary academic and multistakeholder positions on transparency in the post-Snowden leak era.” Ethical Space: The International Journal of Communication Ethics 12(3): 25-38.

    Barnard-Wills, David. 2011. “UK News Media Discourses of Surveillance.” The Sociological Quarterly, 52(4): 548-567.

    Beck, Ulrich. 2006. “Living in the world risk society”. Economy and Society. 35(3): 329- 345. doi: 10.1080/03085140600844902

    Bradshaw, Paul. 2015. “Chilling effect: regional journalists' source protection and information security practice in the wake of the Snowden and RIPA revelations.” Surveillance and Citizenship: State-Media-Citizen Relations after the Snowden Leaks Cardiff University, 1-32.

    Brevini, Benedetta, Arne Hintz and Patrick McCurdy, eds. 2013. Beyond WikiLeaks: Implications for the future of communications, journalism and society. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Christensen, Lars Thøger, and George Cheney. 2015. “Peering into Transparency: Challenging Ideals, Proxies, and Organizational Practices”. Communication Theory, 25(1): 70-90. doi: 10.1111/comt.12052

    Couldry, Nick. 2015. “The myth of 'us': digital networks, political change and the production of collectivity”. Information, Communication & Society. 18(6): 608-626. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2014.979216

    Entman, Robert M., 1993. “Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm”. Journal of Communication. 43(4). pp. 51-58.

    Hall, Stuart. 1973. Encoding and Decoding in the Television Discourse. Birmingham: University of Birmingham.

    Henrichsen, Jennifer R., Michelle Betz and Joanne M. Lisosky. 2015. Building digital safety for journalism: a survey of selected issues. Paris: UNESCO.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark