A systematic review of randomised controlled trials of interventions promoting effective condom use

Article English OPEN
Free, C ; Roberts, IG ; Abramsky, T ; Fitzgerald, M ; Wensley, F (2011)
  • Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group
  • Journal: Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health (issn: 0143-005X, vol: 65, pp: 100-110)
  • Related identifiers: pmc: PMC3009845, doi: 10.1136/jech.2008.085456
  • Subject: sexual health | sexual behaviour | Essay | Contraception RB | 1506 | contraception SA | sexually transdis

Background Effective condom use can prevent sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and unwanted pregnancy. We conducted a systematic review and methodological appraisal of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of interventions to promote effective condom use. Methods We searched for all RCTs of interventions to promote effective condom use using the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group's trials register (Oct 2006), CENTRAL (Issue 4, 2006), MEDLINE (1966 to Oct 2006), EMBASE (1974 to Oct 2006), LILACS (1982 to Oct 2006), IBSS (1951 to Oct 2006) and Psychinfo (1996 to Oct 2006). We extracted data on allocation sequence, allocation concealment, blinding, loss to follow-up and measures of effect. Effect estimates were calculated. Results We identified 139 trials. Seven out of ten trials reported reductions in ‘any STI’ with five statistically significant results. Three out of four trials reported reductions in pregnancy, although none was statistically significant. Only four trials met all the quality criteria. Trials reported a median of 11 (IQR 7–17) outcome measures. Few trials used the same outcome measure. Altogether, 10 trials (7%) used the outcome ‘any STI’, 4 (3%) self-reported pregnancy and 22 (16%) used ‘condom use at last sex’. Conclusions The results are generally consistent with modest benefits but there is considerable potential for bias due to poor trial quality. Because of the low proportion of trials using the same outcome the potential for bias from selective reporting of outcomes is considerable. Despite the public health importance of increasing condom use there is little reliable evidence on the effectiveness of condom promotion interventions.
  • References (109)
    109 references, page 1 of 11

    1. WHO. Global prevalence and incidence of selected curable sexually transmitted infections: overview and estimates. World Health Organization: Geneva, 2001.

    2. Alan Guttmacher Institute. Sharing responsibility: women, society and abortion. New York: Alan Guttmacher Institute, 1999.

    3. UNAIDS. AIDS epidemic update. Geneva: UNAIDS, 2003.

    4. Farr G, Gabelnick H, Sturgen K, et al. Contraceptive efficacy and acceptability of the female condom. Am J Public Health 1994;84:1960e4.

    5. Spruyt A, Steiner MJ, Joanis C, et al. Identifying condom users at risk for breakage and slippage: findings from three international sites. Am J Public Health 1998;88:239e44.

    6. Shepherd J, Weston R, Peersman G, et al. Interventions for encouraging sexual lifestyles and behaviours intended to prevent cervical cancer (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 1. Oxford: Update Software, 2007.

    7. Johnson WD, Hedges LV, Diaz RM. Interventions to modify sexual risk behaviors for preventing HIV infection in men who have sex with men (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 1. Oxford: Update Software, 2007.

    8. Oakley A, Fullerton D, Holland J. Behavioral interventions for HIV/AIDS prevention. AIDS 1995;9:479e86.

    9. Juni P, Altman DG, Egger M. Systematic reviews in health care: assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. BMJ 2001;323:42e6.

    10. Chan AW, Hrobjartsson A, Haahr MT, et al. Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles. JAMA 2004;291:2457e65.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark