Procedural fairness in lotteries assigning initial roles in a dynamic setting

Article English OPEN
Grimalda, Gianluca ; Kar, Anirban ; Proto, Eugenio (2015)

We extend the study of procedural fairness in three new directions. Firstly, we focus on lotteries determining the initial roles in a two-person game. One of the roles carries a potential advantage over the other. All the experimental literature has thus far focused on lotteries determining the final payoffs of a game. Secondly, we modify procedural fairness in a dynamic—i.e. over several repetitions of a game—as well as in a static—i.e. within a single game-sense. Thirdly, we analyse whether assigning individuals a minimal chance of achieving an advantaged position is enough to make them willing to accept substantially more inequality. We find that procedural fairness matters under all of these accounts. Individuals clearly respond to the degree of fairness in assigning initial roles, appraise contexts that are dynamically fair more positively than contexts that are not, and are generally more willing to accept unequal outcomes when they are granted a minimal opportunity to acquire the advantaged position. Unexpectedly, granting full equality of opportunity does not lead to the highest efficiency.
  • References (49)
    49 references, page 1 of 5

    [1] Alesina, A., La Ferrara, E. (2005). \ Preferences for redistribution in the land of opportunities", Journal of Public Economics, 89(5-6), 897-931.

    [2] Anand, P. (2001). \Procedural fairness in economic and social choice: Evidence from a survey of voters", Journal of Economic Psychology, 22(2), 247-270.

    [3] Andreozzi, L., Ploner, M., & Soraperra, I. (2013). Justice among strangers. On altruism, inequality aversion and fairness. Working paper No. 1304, CEEL, Trento University.

    [4] Armantier, O. (2006).\Do Wealth Di erences A ect Fairness Considerations?", International Economic Review, 47(2), 391-429.

    [5] Becker, A., Miller, L. (2009). \Promoting justice by treating people unequally: an experimental study", Experimental Economics, 12(4), 437- 449.

    [6] Bewley, T. (1999). Why Wages don't Fall during a Recession. Harvard: Harvard Univ. Press.

    [7] Benabou, R., Tirole, J. (2006). \Belief in the Just World and Redistributive Politics", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 699-746.

    [8] Binmore, Kenneth, Peter Morgan, Avner Shaked, John Sutton (1991). \Do People Exploit Their Bargaining Power?: An Experimental Study", Games and Economic Behavior, 3, 295{322.

    [9] Bolton, G. E., Brandts, J.,Ockenfels, A. (2005). \Fair Procedures: Evidence from Games Involving Lotteries", Economic Journal, 115(506), 1054-1076.

    [10] Bolton, G., Ockenfels, A. (2000). \A theory of equity, reciprocity and competition", American Economic Review, 90, 166-93.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark