Human factors in prehospital research : lessons from the PARAMEDIC trial

Article English OPEN
Pocock, Helen ; Deakin, Charles D ; Quinn, Tom ; Perkins, Gavin D ; Horton, Jessica ; Gates, Simon (2016)

BACKGROUND:\ud There is an urgent need to develop prehospital research capability in order to improve the care of patients presenting to emergency medical services (EMS). The Prehospital Randomised Assessment of a Mechanical compression Device In Cardiac arrest trial, a pragmatic cluster randomised trial evaluating the LUCAS-2 device, represents the largest randomised controlled trial conducted by UK ambulance services to date. The aim of this study was to identify and analyse factors that may influence paramedic attitudes to, and participation in, clinical trials.\ud \ud METHODS:\ud Personal and organisational experience from this trial was assessed by feedback from a workshop attended by collaborators from participating EMS and a survey of EMS personnel participating in the trial. A work systems model was used to explain the impact of five interwoven themes-person, organisation, tasks, tools & technology and environment-on trial conduct including gathering of high-quality data.\ud \ud RESULTS:\ud The challenge of training a geographically diverse EMS workforce required development of multiple educational solutions. In order to operationalise the trial protocol, internal organisational relationships were perceived as essential. Staff perceptions of the normalisation of participation and ownership of the trial influenced protocol compliance rates. Undertaking research was considered less burdensome when additional tasks were minimised and more difficult when equipment was unavailable. The prehospital environment presents practical challenges for undertaking clinical trials, but our experience suggests these are not insurmountable and should not preclude conducting high-quality research in this setting.\ud \ud CONCLUSIONS:\ud Application of a human factors model to the implementation of a clinical trial protocol has improved understanding of the work system, which can inform the future conduct of clinical trials and foster a research culture within UK ambulance services.
  • References (9)

    3. Jones CW, Hunold KM, Isaacs CG, et al. Randomized trials in emergency medicine journals, 2008 to 2011. Am J Emerg Med 2013;31(1):231-235.

    4. Pepe PE, Copass MK, Sopko G. Clinical trials in the out-of-hospital setting: rationale and strategies for successful implementation. Crit Care Med 2009;37(1):S91- 101.

    6. Montalescot G, van't Hof AW, Lapostolle F, et al. Prehospital Ticagrelor in S-T segment elevation myocardial infarction. New Engl J Med 2014;371:1016-1027.

    7. Shaw L, Price C, McLure S, et al. Paramedic Initiated Lisinopril for Acute Stroke Treatment (PIL-FAST): study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial. Trials 2011;12:152. Accessed at on 18/07/13.

    8. Ankolekar S, Fuller M, Cross I et al. Feasibility of an ambulance-based stroke trial and safety of glyceryl trinitrate in ultra-acute stroke: the Rapid Intervention with Glyceryl trinitrate in Hypertensive stroke Trial (RIGHT). Stroke 2013;44(11):3120-3128.

    9. Benger JR, Voss S, Coates D et al. Randomised comparison of the effectiveness of the

    19. Smyth M. A randomized controlled trial of a mechanical compression device. Journal of Paramedic Practice 2012;4(1)28-33.

    20. Nadler D, Tushman M. Strategic Organization Design: Concepts, Tools and Processes. Glenview, IL: Scott 1988.

    21. Kathuria R, Maheshkumar PJ, Porth SJ (2007) Organizational alignment and performance: past, present and future. Management Decision 2007; 45(3)503-17.

  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    Kingston University Research Repository - IRUS-UK 0 220
Share - Bookmark