Do personal stories make patient decision aids more effective: a critical review of evidence and theory?

Article English OPEN
Bekker, HL ; Winterbottom, AE ; Butow, P ; Dillard, A ; Feldman-Stewart, D ; Fowler, FJ ; Jibaja-Weiss, M ; Shaffer, V ; Volk, RJ (2013)
  • Publisher: Biomed Central

Background: Patient decision aids support people to make informed decisions between healthcare options. Personal stories provide illustrative examples of others’ experiences and are seen as a useful way to communicate information about health and illness. Evidence indicates that providing information within personal stories affects the judgments and values people have, and the choices they make, differentially from facts presented in nonnarrative prose. It is unclear if including narrative communications within patient decision aids enhances their effectiveness to support people to make informed decisions. Methods: A survey of primary empirical research employing a systematic review method investigated the effect of patient decision aids with or without a personal story on people’s healthcare judgements and decisions. Searches were carried out between 2005-2012 of electronic databases (Medline, PsycINFO), and reference lists of identified articles, review articles, and key authors. A narrative analysis described and synthesised findings. Results: Of 734 citations identified, 11 were included describing 13 studies. All studies found participants’ judgments and/or decisions differed depending on whether or not their decision aid included a patient story. Knowledge was equally facilitated when the decision aids with and without stories had similar information content. Story-enhanced aids may help people recall information over time and/or their motivation to engage with health information. Personal stories affected both “system 1” (e.g., less counterfactual reasoning, more emotional reactions and perceptions) and “system 2” (e.g., more perceived deliberative decision making, more stable evaluations over time) decision-making strategies. Findings exploring associations with narrative communications, decision quality measures, and different levels of literacy and numeracy were mixed. The pattern of findings was similar for both experimental and real-world studies. Conclusions: There is insufficient evidence that adding personal stories to decision aids increases their effectiveness to support people’s informed decision making. More rigorous research is required to elicit evidence about the type of personal story that a) encourages people to make more reasoned decisions, b) discourages people from making choices based on another’s values, and c) motivates people equally to engage with healthcare resources.
  • References (52)
    52 references, page 1 of 6

    1. Stacey D, Bennett CL, Barry MJ, Col NF, Eden KB, Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Lyddiatt A, Légaré F, Thomson R: Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev 2011, 10, Art. No.: CD001431. DOI: 10.1002/ 14651858.CD001431.pub3.

    2. Bekker HL: The loss of reason in patient decision aid research: do checklists affect the validity of informed choice interventions? Patient Educ Couns 2010, 78:357-364.

    3. Sepucha K, Thomson R, Borkhoff CM, Lally J, Levin CA, Matlock DD, Ng CJ, Ropka M, Stacey D, Joseph-Williams N, Wills CE: Establishing effectiveness. In 2012 Update of the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) collaboration's background document. Chapter L Volk R & Llewellyn-Thomas H 2012 [].

    4. Winterbottom AE, Bekker HL, Conner MT, Mooney A: Does narrative information bias individual's decision making? A systematic review. Soc Sci Med 2008, 67(12):2079-2088.

    5. Butow P, Fowler J, Ziebland S: Section 5: Using Personal Stories. In IPDAS International Collaboration Document A O'Connor, Llewellyn-Thomas, H. & Stacey, D 2005, Retrieved from (Accessed on 01/01/2010).

    6. Murray M: Chapter 6. Narrative psychology and narrative analysis. In Qualitative research in psychology: expanding perspectives in methodology and design. Washington DC, USA: American Psychological Association;Camic PM, Rhodes JE, Yardley L 2003:.

    7. Greenhalgh T, Hurwitz B: Narrative based medicine: Why study narrative. BMJ 1999, 318:48-50.

    8. Hyden L-C: Illness and narrative. Sociol Health and Illn 1997, 19:48-69.

    9. Bury M: Illness narratives: fact or fiction? Sociol Health and Illn 2001, 23:263-285.

    10. Khangura S, Bennett C, Stacey D, O'Connor AM: Personal stories in publicly available patient decision aids. Patient Educ Couns 2008, 73:456-464.

  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    White Rose Research Online - IRUS-UK 0 23
Share - Bookmark