Update: Eliciting societal preferences for weighting QALY's according to burden of illness, size of gain and end of life

Book English OPEN
Rowen, D. ; Brazier, J. ; Mukuria, C. ; Keetharuth, A. ; Rise Hole, A. ; Tsuchiya, A. ; Whyte, S. ; Shackley, P. (2014)
  • Publisher: Policy Research Unit in Economic Evaluation of Health and Care Interventions
  • References (4)

    (1) Claxton K, Martin S, Soares M, Rice N, Spackman E, Hinde S, et al. Methods for the estimation of the NICE cost-effectiveness threshold. 2013.

    (15) National Institute of Health and Care Excellence. Appraising life-extending, end of life treatments. London: NICE; 2009.

    (16) Lancsar E, Wildman J, Donaldson C, Ryan M, Baker R. Deriving distributional weights for QALYs through discrete choice experiments. J Health Econ 2011 Mar;30(2):466-78.

    (17) Brazier J, Rowen D, Mukuria C, Whyte S, Keetharuth A, Risa Hole A, et al. Eliciting societal preferences for burden of illness, therapeutic improvement and end of life for value based pricing. Universities of Sheffield and York; 2014. Report No.: EEPRU research report no 11.

  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    White Rose Research Online - IRUS-UK 0 17
Share - Bookmark