Marketing performance assessment systems and the business context

Article English OPEN
Frösén, Johanna ; Tikkanen, Henrikki ; Jaakkola, Matti ; Vassinen, Antti (2013)

Purpose ‐ This study provides empirical evidence for the contextuality of marketing performance assessment (MPA) systems. It aims to introduce a taxonomical classification of MPA profiles based on the relative emphasis placed on different dimensions of marketing performance in different companies and business contexts. Design/methodology/approach ‐ The data used in this study (n=1,157) were collected using a web-based questionnaire, targeted to top managers in Finnish companies. Two multivariate data analysis techniques were used to address the research questions. First, dimensions of marketing performance underlying the current MPA systems were identified through factor analysis. Second, a taxonomy of different profiles of marketing performance measurement was created by clustering respondents based on the relative emphasis placed on the dimensions and characterizing them vis-á-vis contextual factors. Findings ‐ The study identifies nine broad dimensions of marketing performance that underlie the MPA systems in use and five MPA profiles typical of companies of varying sizes in varying industries, market life cycle stages, and competitive positions associated with varying levels of market orientation and business performance. The findings support the previously conceptual notion of contextuality in MPA and provide empirical evidence for the factors that affect MPA systems in practice. Originality/value ‐ The paper presents the first field study of current MPA systems focusing on combinations of metrics in use. The findings of the study provide empirical support for the contextuality of MPA and form a classification of existing contextual systems suitable for benchmarking purposes. Limited evidence for performance differences between MPA profiles is also provided.
  • References (14)
    14 references, page 1 of 2

    Agrawal, J. and Kamakura, W.A. (1995), “The economic worth of celebrity endorsers: an event study analysis”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 59 No. 1, pp. 56-62.

    Ambler, T., Kokkinaki, F. and Puntoni, S. (2004), “Assessing marketing performance: reasons for metrics selection”, Journal of Marketing Management, Vol. 20 Nos. 3/4, pp. 475-498.

    Ambler, T. and Roberts J.H. (2008), “Assessing marketing performance: don't settle for a silver metric”, Journal of Marketing Management, Vol. 24 Nos. 7/8, pp. 733-750.

    Armstrong, J.S., and Overton, T.S. (1977), “Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 369-402.

    Barwise, P. and Farley, J.U. (2004), “Marketing metrics: status of six metrics in five countries”, European Management Journal, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 257-262.

    Berger, P.D., Eechambadi, N., George, M., Lehmann, D.R., Rizley, R. and Venkatesan, R. (2006), “From customer lifetime value to shareholder value”, Journal of Service Research, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp.

    Berger, P.D. and Nasr, N.I. (1998), “Customer lifetime value: marketing models and applications,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 17-30.

    Bhargava, M., Dubelaar, C. and Ramaswami, S. (1994), “Reconciling diverse measures of performance: a conceptual framework and test of a methodology”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 31 Nos. 2/3, pp. 235-246.

    Blenkinsop, S.A. and Burns, N. (1992), “Performance measurement revisited”, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 12 No. 10, pp. 16-25.

    Chakravarthy, B.S. (1986), “Measuring strategic performance”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 7 No. 5, pp.437-458.

  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    Aston Publications Explorer - IRUS-UK 0 509
Share - Bookmark