The Martyrdom Effect: When Pain and Effort Increase Prosocial Contributions

Article English OPEN
Olivola, Christopher Y ; Shafir, Eldar (2011)
  • Publisher: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
  • Journal: Journal of Behavioral Decision Making (issn: 0894-3257, vol: 26, pp: 91-105)
  • Related identifiers: pmc: PMC3613749, doi: 10.1002/bdm.767, doi: 10.1002/bdm.767
  • Subject: prosocial behavior | fundraising | BF | martyrdom effect | self-sacrifice | charity | Research Articles

Most theories of motivation and behavior (and lay intuitions alike) consider pain and effort to be deterrents. In contrast to this widely held view, we provide evidence that the prospect of enduring pain and exerting effort for a prosocial cause can promote contributions to the cause. Specifically, we show that willingness to contribute to a charitable or collective cause increases when the contribution process is expected to be painful and effortful rather than easy and enjoyable. Across five experiments, we document this “martyrdom effect,” show that the observed patterns defy standard economic and psychological accounts, and identify a mediator and moderator of the effect. Experiment 1 showed that people are willing to donate more to charity when they anticipate having to suffer to raise money. Experiment 2 extended these findings to a non-charity laboratory context that involved real money and actual pain. Experiment 3 demonstrated that the martyrdom effect is not the result of an attribute substitution strategy (whereby people use the amount of pain and effort involved in fundraising to determine donation worthiness). Experiment 4 showed that perceptions of meaningfulness partially mediate the martyrdom effect. Finally, Experiment 5 demonstrated that the nature of the prosocial cause moderates the martyrdom effect: the effect is strongest for causes associated with human suffering. We propose that anticipated pain and effort lead people to ascribe greater meaning to their contributions and to the experience of contributing, thereby motivating higher prosocial contributions. We conclude by considering some implications of this puzzling phenomenon. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
  • References (64)
    64 references, page 1 of 7

    Ariely, D., Kamenica, E., & Prelec, D. (2008). Man's search for meaning: The case of Legos. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 67, 671-677.

    Aronson, E., & Mills, J. (1959). The effect of severity of initiation on liking for a group. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 59, 177-181.

    Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.

    Barry, P. (2006, November 29). Glass act! Surrey & Hants Star. Retrieved March 29, 2008, from http://www.shstar.co.uk/

    Becker, G. S. (1993). Nobel lecture: The economic way of looking at behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 101, 385-409.

    Bem, D. J. (1967). Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. Psychological Review, 74, 183-200.

    Bénabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2003). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Review of Economic Studies, 70, 489-520.

    Bénabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2006). Incentives and prosocial behavior. American Economic Review, 96, 1652-1678.

    Berns, G. (2005). Satisfaction: The science of finding true fulfillment. New York: Henry Holt.

    Bentham, J. (1988). The principles of morals and legislation. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books (Originally published, 1781).

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark