Defining forgiveness: Christian clergy and general population perspectives.

Article English OPEN
Macaskill, A. (2005)

<p>The lack of any consensual definition of forgiveness is a serious weakness in the research literature (McCullough, Pargament &amp; Thoresen, 2000). As forgiveness is at the core of Christianity, this study returns to the Christian source of the concept to explore the meaning of forgiveness for practicing Christian clergy. Comparisons are made with a general population sample and social science definitions of forgiveness to ensure that a shared meaning of forgiveness is articulated. Anglican and Roman Catholic clergy (N = 209) and a general population sample (N = 159) completed a postal questionnaire about forgiveness. There is agreement on the existence of individual differences in forgiveness. Clergy and the general population perceive reconciliation as necessary for forgiveness while there is no consensus within psychology. The clergy suggests that forgiveness is limitless and that repentance is unnecessary while the general population suggests that there are limits and that repentance is necessary. Psychological definitions do not conceptualize repentance as necessary for forgiveness and the question of limits has not been addressed although within therapy the implicit assumption is that forgiveness is limitless.</p>
  • References (26)
    26 references, page 1 of 3

    Macaskill, A. (2002). Heal the hurt: How to forgive and move on. London: Sheldon Press.

    Macaskill, A. & Maltby, J. (2002). Forgiveness of self and others and emotional empathy. Journal of Social Psychology, 142, 663-665.

    Maltby, J., Macaskill, A. & Day, L. (2000). Failure to forgive self and others: a replication and extension of the relationship between forgiveness, personality, social desirability and general health. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 881-885.

    Marty, M. E. (1998). The ethos of Christian forgiveness. In E. L. Worthington, Jr. (Ed.) Dimensions of forgiveness (pp139-161). Radnor, P A: Templeton Foundation Press.

    Mason, J. (1996). Qualitative researching. London: Sage Publications.

    Mauger, P.A., Perry, J.E., Freeman, T., Grove, D.C., McBride, A.G., & McKinney, K.E. (1992). The measurement of forgiveness: preliminary research. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 11, 170-180.

    McCullough, M.E. (2000). Forgiveness as human strength: Theory, measurement, and links to well-being. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19, 43-55.

    McCullough, M.E., Pargament, K. I., & Thoresen, C. E. (2000). The psychology of forgiveness. In M. E. McCullough, K. I. Pargament, & C. E. Thoresen (Eds.) Forgiveness: Theory, research and practice (pp. 1-14). New York: The Guilford Press.

    McCullough, M .E. & Worthington, E. L. Jr. (1999). Religion and the forgiving personality. Journal of Personality, 67, 1141-1164.

    McCullough, M.E., Worthington, E.L. & Rachal, K.C. (1997). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 321-336.

  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive - IRUS-UK 0 278
Share - Bookmark