What airway and vascular access skills can be performed whilst\ud wearing the NHS issued chemical, biological, radiation, and\ud nuclear personal protective equipment?

Doctoral thesis English OPEN
Castle, Nicholas
  • Subject: R
    mesheuropmc: education

The introduction of chemical, biological, radiation and nuclear personal protective equipment (CBRN-PPE) across the National Health Service (NHS), in 2007, represented an increase in the capacity to treat patients following a CBRN incident. However, little was known on what impact the NHS CBRN-PPE would have on skill performance. \ud \ud To date a number of studies have evaluated various skills performed whilst wearing a range of CBRN-PPE, none of which resembles the NHS CBRN-PPE. This gap in the evidence prompted a series of research studies addressing the following research question, ‘What airway and vascular access skills can be performed whilst wearing the NHS issued chemical, biological, radiation, and nuclear personal protective equipment? The resulting nine published peer-reviewed papers are presented with a critical commentary in three chapters: Chapter 3 (Papers 1 to 4) assesses what clinical skills can be performed using the\ud NHS CBRN-PPE; Chapter 4 (Papers 5 & 6) explores clinicians’ views on the preferences and experiences of airway management whilst wearing CBRN-PPE; and Chapter 5 (Papers 7 to 9) evaluates the optimal strategies of airway management whilst wearing the NHS CBRN-PPE. Chapter 6 is a summary of the findings presented in this thesis and presents a number of new research questions to further expand our knowledge-base, regarding skill performance whilst wearing NHS CBRN-PPE, reflecting the developmental nature of this area of research.\ud \ud The research contained in this thesis utilises a combination of randomised controlled trials, interviews and questionnaires, to ascertain the impact of the NHS CBRN-PPE on skill completion. Papers 1 to 4 recruited a group of mixed clinicians allowing subgroup analysis observing for inter-professional differences regarding skill performance. Whereas, Papers 7 to 9 recruited student paramedics ensuring similar levels of airway management skills, thereby isolating prior expertise as a variable.\ud \ud The research presented in this thesis has been used during simulation training as part preparations for the 2012 Olympics, in the development of a CBRN training DVD and incorporated into a textbook. The results have also been shared with NHS England working party on CBRN-PPE and, are being incorporated into CBRN treatment protocols by an\ud overseas ambulance service.
  • References (211)
    211 references, page 1 of 22

    1. Baker D. Minds at war. Burgess Hill: Saxon books, 1996.

    2. Al-Damouk M, Bleetman A. Impact of the department of health initiatives to equip and train acute trusts to manage chemically contaminated casualties. Emerg Med J 2005;22(5):347-50.

    3. Horby P, Murray V, Cummins A, Mackway-Jones K, Euripidou R. The capability of accident and emergency departments to safely decontaminate victims of chemical incidents J Accid Emerg 2000;17(5):344-47.

    4. George G, Ramsay K, Rochester M, Seah R, Spencer H, Vijayasankar D, et al. Facilities for chemical decontamination in accident and emergency departments in the United Kingdom. Emerg Med J 2002;19(5):453-57.

    5. Mayor S. National Audit Office report shows gaps in emergency planning. BMJ 2002;325(7374):1193.

    6. Wimbush S, Davies G, Lockey D. The presentation and management of victims of chemical and biological agents: a survey of knowledge of UK clinicians. Resuscitation 2003;58(3):289-92.

    7. Holdsworth D, Bland S, O'Reilly D. CBRN Response and the Future. J R Army Med Corps 2012;158(1):48-63.

    8. Byers M, Russell M, Lockey DJ. Clinical care in the "Hot Zone". Emerg Med J 2008;25(2):108-12.

    9. Mazzone A. The use of CBRN weapons by non-state terrorists. GSS 2013;4(4):23-30.

    10. Sharp TW, Brennan RJ, Keim M, Williams RJ, Eitzen E, Lillibridge S. Medical preparedness for a terrorist incident involving chemical or biological agents during the 1996 Atlanta Olympic Games. Ann Emerg Med 1998;32(2):214-23.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark