The end of the line for a brain-damaged model of unilateral neglect

Article English OPEN
Mozer, M. C. ; Halligan, Peter ; Marshall, J. C. (1997)

For more than a century, it has been known that damage to\ud the right hemisphere of the brain can cause patients to be\ud unaware of the contralesional side of space. This condition,\ud known as unilateral neglect, represents a collection of clinically\ud related spatial disorders characterized by the failure in\ud free vision to respond, explore, or orient to stimuli predominantly\ud located on the side of space opposite the damaged\ud hemisphere. Recent studies using the simple task of line bisection,\ud a conventional diagnostic test, have proven surprisingly\ud revealing with respect to the spatial and attentional impairments\ud involved in neglect. In line bisection, the patient is asked\ud to mark the midpoint of a thin horizontal lie on a sheet of\ud paper. Neglect patients generally transect far to the right of the\ud center. Extensive studies of line bisection have been conducted,\ud manipulating-among other factors-line length, orientation,\ud and position. We have simulated the pattern of results\ud using an existing computational model of visual perception\ud and selective attention called MORSEL (Mozer, 1991). MORSEL has\ud already been used to model data in a related disorder, neglect\ud INTRODUCTION\ud Neglect\ud Unilateral neglect or bemi-inattention describes a collection\ud of behavioral symptoms in which patients appear\ud to ignore, forget, or turn away from contralesional space\ud (Heilman, Watson, & Valenstein, 1993). Neglect after\ud right-sided lesions is more frequent, long lasting, and\ud severe than after equivalent lesions of the left hemisphere.\ud The disorder can compromise visual, auditory,\ud tactile, and olfactory modalities and may involve personal,\ud peripersonal, extrapersonal, and “imaginal” space\ud (Halligan & Marshall, 1993a). Unilateral neglect is far\ud from a unitary phenomenon and has been shown to\ud fractionate into a number of dissociable components in\ud dyslexia (Mozer & Behrmann, 1990). In this earlier work, MORSEL\ud was “lesioned” in accordance with the damage we suppose to\ud have occurred in the brains of neglect patients. The same\ud model and lesion can simulate the detailed pattern of performance\ud on line bisection, including the following observations:\ud (1) no consistent across-subject bias is found in normals; (2)\ud transection displacements are proportional to line length in\ud neglect patients; (3) variability of displacements is proportional\ud to line length, in both normals and patients; (4) position of the\ud lines with respect to the body or the page on which they are\ud drawn has little effect; and (5) for lines drawn at different\ud orientations, displacements are proportional to the cosine of\ud the orientation angle. MORSEL fails to account for one observation:\ud across patients, the variability of displacements for a\ud particular line length is roughly proportional to mean displacement.\ud Nonetheless, the overall fit of the model is sufficiently\ud good that we believe MORSEL can be used as a diagnostic tool\ud to characterize the specific nature of a patient’s deficit, and\ud thereby has potential down the line in therapy.
  • References (38)
    38 references, page 1 of 4

    Axenfeld, D. (1915). Hemianopische Gesichtsfeldstroungen nach Schadelschussen.Klin.Monatsble.Angerbeilkd., 55, 126-143.

    Barbieri,C., & De Renzi,E. (1989). Patterns of neglect dissociation. Bebavioural Neurology, 2, 13-24.

    Behrmann,M., Moscovitch,M., Black, S. E., & Mozer, M. C. (1990). Perceptual and conceptual mechanisms in neglect dyslexia:?bvo contrasting case studies.Brain, 113, 1163- 1183.

    Bisiach, E., Bulgarelli, C., Sterzi,R., & Vallar, G. (1983). Line bisection and cognitive plasticity of unilateral neglect of space. Brain and Cognition, 2, 32-38.

    Bisiach, E., Capitani, E., Colombo,A., & Spinnler,H. (1976). Halving a horizontal segment:A study on hemispheredamaged patients with focal cerebral lesions.Archives Suisses de Neurologie, Neurocbirgurie et de Psycbiatrie, 118,199-206.

    Bradshaw,J. L., Nettleton, N. C., Nathan, G., & Wilson, L. E. (1985). Bisecting rods and lines: Effects of horizontal and vertical posture on left side underestimation by normal subjects.Neuropsycbologia,23, 421-436.

    Burnett-Stuart,G., Halligan, I? W., & Marshall,J. C. (1991). A Newtonian model of perceptual distortion in visuo-spatial neglect. NeuroReport, 2, 255-257.

    Butter, C. M. (1987). Varieties of attention and disturbances of attention:A neuropsychological analysis. In M.Jeannerod (Ed.),Neuropbysiological and neuropsycbological aspects of spatial neglect (pp. 1-24). Amsterdam:North Holland.

    Butter, C. M., Evans,J., Kirsch,N., & Kewans,D. (1989). Altitudinal neglect following traumatic brain injury: A case report. Cortex, 25, 135-146.

    Halligan, I? W., Manning, L., & Marshall,J. C. (1991). Hemispheric activation versus spatio-motor cueing in visual neglect: A case study.Neuropsycbologia,29, 165-175.

  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    Online Research @ Cardiff - IRUS-UK 0 26
Share - Bookmark