Identifying factors likely to influence compliance with diagnostic imaging guideline recommendations for spine disorders among chiropractors in North America: a focus group study using the Theoretical Domains Framework

Article English OPEN
Bussières, André E ; , ; Patey, Andrea M ; Francis, Jill J ; Sales, Anne E ; Grimshaw, Jeremy M (2012)
  • Publisher: Springer Nature
  • Journal: Implementation Science (vol: 7, pp: 82-82)
  • Related identifiers: doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-82, pmc: PMC3444898
  • Subject: Social/professional role and identity | Radiography | Theoretical domains framework | X-ray guidelines | Research | RA | Health Policy | Content analysis | Back pain | Focus groups | Medicine(all) | Social influence | Chiropractors | Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
    mesheuropmc: humanities

Background: The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) was developed to investigate determinants of specific clinical behaviors and inform the design of interventions to change professional behavior. This framework was used to explore the beliefs of chiropractors in an American Provider Network and two Canadian provinces about their adherence to evidence-based recommendations for spine radiography for uncomplicated back pain. The primary objective of the study was to identify chiropractors’ beliefs about managing uncomplicated back pain without xrays and to explore barriers and facilitators to implementing evidence-based recommendations on lumbar spine xrays. A secondary objective was to compare chiropractors in the United States and Canada on their beliefs regarding the use of spine x-rays.\ud \ud Methods: Six focus groups exploring beliefs about managing back pain without x-rays were conducted with a purposive sample. The interview guide was based upon the TDF. Focus groups were digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed by two independent assessors using thematic content analysis based on the TDF.\ud \ud Results: Five domains were identified as likely relevant. Key beliefs within these domains included the following: conflicting comments about the potential consequences of not ordering x-rays (risk of missing a pathology, avoiding adverse treatment effects, risks of litigation, determining the treatment plan, and using x-ray-driven techniques contrasted with perceived benefits of minimizing patient radiation exposure and reducing costs; beliefs about consequences); beliefs regarding professional autonomy, professional credibility, lack of standardization, and agreement with guidelines widely varied (social/professional role & identity); the influence of formal training, colleagues, and patients also appeared to be important factors (social influences); conflicting comments regarding levels of confidence and comfort in managing patients without x-rays (belief about capabilities); and guideline awareness and agreements (knowledge).\ud \ud Conclusions: Chiropractors’ use of diagnostic imaging appears to be influenced by a number of factors. Five key domains may be important considering the presence of conflicting beliefs, evidence of strong beliefs likely to impact the behavior of interest, and high frequency of beliefs. The results will inform the development of a theorybased survey to help identify potential targets for behavioral-change strategies.
  • References (89)
    89 references, page 1 of 9

    1. Isaacs DM, Marinac J, Sun C: Radiograph use in low back pain: a United States Emergency Department database analysis. Emergency med 2004, 26:37-45.

    2. Williams CM, Maher CG, Hancock MJ, McAuley JH, McLachlan AJ, Britt H, Fahridin S, Harrison C, Latimer J: Low back pain and best practice care: a survey of general practice physicians. Arch Intern Med 2010, 170:271-277.

    3. Ferriman A: UK rate of x ray examination less than half the US rate. BMJ 2001, 322:384d.

    4. Chou R, Fu R, Carrino JA, Deyo RA: Imaging strategies for low-back pain: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2009, 373:463-472.

    5. Ammendolia C, Bombardier C, Hogg-Johnson S, Glazier R: Views on radiography use for patients with acute low back pain among chiropractors in an Ontario community. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2002, 25:511-520.

    6. Ammendolia C, Hogg-Johnson S, Pennick V, Glazier R, Bombardier C: Implementing evidence-based guidelines for radiography in acute low back pain: a pilot study in a chiropractic community. J J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2004, 27:170-179.

    7. Assendelft W, Pfeifle C, Bouter L: Chiropractic in The Netherlands: a survey of Dutch chiropractors. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1995, 18:129-134.

    8. Carey TS, Garrett J: North Carolina back pain project. Patterns of ordering diagnostic tests for patients with acute low back pain. Ann Intern Med 1996, 125:807-813.

    9. Ernst E: Chiropractors' use of X-rays. Br J Radiol 1998, 71:249-251.

    10. Scheurmier N, Breen AC: A pilot study of the purchase of manipulation services for acute low back pain in the United Kingdom. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1998, 21:14-18.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark