Can the natural turf pitch be viewed as a risk factor for injury within Association Football?

Article English OPEN
Rennie, DJ ; Vanrenterghem, J ; Littlewood, MA ; Drust, B

OBJECTIVES: A review of the current literature is used to propose a 'conceptual model for relative pitch hardness' and how this may affect incidence of injury within Association Football. Based upon the injury risk and causation model of Meeuwisse et al. (Clin J Sport Med 2007; 17(3):215), it may provide researchers a necessary framework to guide future research investigations. DESIGN: A literature review. METHODS: A comprehensive search of electronic databases available until October 2014, and supplemental hand searching was conducted to identify relevant studies. Studies were deemed relevant if they met the following criteria: published in English, presented or referenced in an epidemiological study or provided data directly and/or related to the surface of the football pitch, ball or boot to surface interaction and injury. Further information was sourced on surface hardness, players' movement patterns and physiological demands within football. RESULTS: Papers varied in methodological quality, with comparative studies examining injury rates on artificial versus natural turf pitches being most prevalent. No prospective studies were found that objectively measured the relationship between hardness of natural turf and injury risk within football. CONCLUSIONS: The literature review into natural turf pitches and injury within football has largely been unable to confirm that pitch hardness can be viewed as a significant extrinsic risk factor. Methodological concerns, including objectivity in pitch assessment and uniformity in defining injuries undermine the efficacy of available work. Future studies are needed utilising objective assessment tools to draw more definitive conclusions regarding pitch hardness as an extrinsic factor for injury within football.
  • References (58)
    58 references, page 1 of 6

    1. Rahnama N. Prevention of football injuries. Int J Prev Med 2011; 2(1):38-40.

    2. Longo UG, Loppini M, Cavagnino R et al. Musculoskeletal problems in soccer players: current concepts. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab 2012; 9(2):107-111.

    3. Bahr R, Krosshaug T. Understanding injury mechanisms: a key component to understanding injury in sport. Br J Sports Med 2005; 39:324-329.

    4. Murphy DF, Connolly DAJ, Beynnon BD. Risk factors for lower extremity injury. Br J Sports Med 2003; 37:13-29.

    5. Meeuwisse W. Assessing causation in sport injury: a multifactorial model. Clin J Sport Med 1994; 4:66-170.

    6. Bahr R, Holme I. Risk factors for sports injuries-a methodological approach. Br J Sports Med 2003; 37:384-392.

    7. Meeuwisse WH, Tyreman H, Hagel B et al. A dynamic model of etiology in sport injury: the recursive nature of risk and causation. Clin J Sport Med 2007; 17(3):215-219.

    8. Bell Ml, Holmes G. The playing quality of association football pitches. J Sports Turf Res Inst 1988; 64:19-47.

    9. Baker SW, Canaway PM. Concepts of playing quality: criteria and measurement. J Sports Turf Res Inst Chem 1993; 20:172-181.

    10. Baker SW, Wheater JA, Spring CA. Performance requirements for surface hardness of winter games pitches. J Turf Sports Surf Sci 2007; 83:83-89.

  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    LJMU Research Online - IRUS-UK 0 120
Share - Bookmark