Perceptions and experiences of interventions to prevent postnatal depression: a systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis

Article English OPEN
Scope, Alison ; Booth, Andrew ; Morrell, C. Jane ; Sutcliffe, Paul ; Cantrell, Anna (2017)

Background\ud \ud More women experience depressive symptoms antenatally than postnatally. Supporting women through the antenatal period is recognised as important in mitigating negative outcomes and in preventing postnatal depression (PND). A systematic review was conducted which aimed to provide a detailed service user and service provider perspective on the uptake, acceptability, and perception of harms of antenatal interventions and postnatal interventions for preventing PND.\ud Methods\ud \ud A comprehensive literature search was conducted in 12 major bibliographic databases in November 2012 and updated in December 2014. Studies were included if they contained qualitative evidence on the perspectives and attitudes of pregnant women and postnatal women who had taken part in, or healthcare professionals (HCPs) involved in delivering, preventive interventions for PND.\ud Results\ud \ud Twenty-two studies were included. Support and empowerment through education were identified as particularly helpful to women as intervention components, across all intervention types. Implications for accessing the service, understanding the remit of the service and women's preferences for group and individual care also emerged.\ud Limitations\ud \ud The majority of the included studies were of moderate or low quality, which may result in a lack of rich data consistently across all studies, limiting to some degree interpretations that can be made.\ud Conclusion\ud \ud The synthesis demonstrated important considerations for devising new interventions or adapting existing interventions. Specifically, it is important that individual or group interventions are carefully tailored to women's needs or preferences and women are aware of the remit of the HCPs role to ensure they feel able to access the support required.
  • References (14)
    14 references, page 1 of 2

    Almond, P., 2009. Postnatal depression: a global public health perspective. Perspect. Public Health 129 (5), 221-227.

    Andersson, E., Christensson, K., Hildingsson, I., 2012. Parents' experiences and perceptions of group-based antenatal care in four clinics in Sweden. Midwifery 28 (4), 502-508.

    Beck, C.T., 2002. Postpartum depression: a metasynthesis. Qual. Health Res. 12 (4), 453-472.

    Brealey, S.D., Hewitt, C., Green, J.M., Morrell, J., Gilbody, S., 2010. Screening for postnatal depression: is it acceptable to women and healthcare professionals? A systematic review and meta-synthesis (Provisional abstract). J. Reprod. Infant Psychol. 28, 328- 344.

    Carolan, M., Barry, M., Gamble, M., Turner, K., Mascarenas, O., 2012a. The Limerick Lullaby project: an intervention to relieve prenatal stress. Midwifery 28 (2), 173-180.

    Carolan, M., Barry, M., Gamble, M., Turner, K., Mascarenas, O., 2012b. Experiences of pregnant women attending a lullaby programme in Limerick, Ireland: a qualitative study. Midwifery 28 (3), 321-328.

    Coe, C., Barlow, J., 2013. Supporting women with perinatal mental health problems: the role of the voluntary sector. Community Pract. 86 (2), 23-27.

    Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP). 2014. CASP Checklists, Oxford, CASP. http://www.casp-uk.net/#!casp-tools-checklists/c18f8 .

    Dennis, C.L., 2010. Postpartum depression peer support: maternal perceptions from a randomized controlled trial. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 47 (5), 560-568.

    Dennis, C.L., 2013. Peer support for postpartum depression: volunteers' perceptions, recruitment strategies and training from a randomized controlled trial. Health Promot. Int. 28 (2), 187-196.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark