Endowment additivity and the weighted proportional rules for adjudicating conflicting claims

Article English OPEN
Harless, Patrick (2017)

We propose and study a new axiom, restricted endowment additivity, for the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims. This axiom requires that awards be additively decomposable with respect to the endowment whenever no agent’s claim is filled. For two-claimant problems, restricted endowment additivity essentially characterizes weighted extensions of the proportional rule. With additional agents, however, the axiom is satisfied by a great variety of rules. Further imposing versions of continuity and consistency, we characterize a new family of rules which generalize the proportional rule. Defined by a priority relation and a weighting function, each rule aims, as nearly as possible, to assign awards within each priority class in proportion to these weights. We also identify important subfamilies and obtain new characterizations of the constrained equal awards and proportional rules based on restricted endowment additivity.
  • References (38)
    38 references, page 1 of 4

    Alcalde, J., del Carmen Marco-Gil, M., and Silva, J. A. (2008). The minimal overlap rule revisited. Social Choice and Welfare, 31:109{128.

    Aumann, R. J. and Maschler, M. (1985). Game theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the Talmud. Journal of Economic Theory, 36:195{213.

    Bergantin~os, G. and Mendez-Naya, L. (2001). Additivity in bankruptcy problems and in allocation problems. Spanish Economic Review, 3(3):223{229.

    Bergantin~os, G. and Vidal-Puga, J. J. (2004). Additive rules in bankruptcy problems and other related problems. Mathematical Social Sciences, 47:87{101.

    Bergantin~os, G. and Vidal-Puga, J. J. (2006). Additive rules in discrete allocation problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 172:971{978.

    Chambers, C. (2006). Asymmetric rules for claims problems without homogeneity. Games and Economic Behavior, 54(5):241{260.

    Chambers, C. and Moreno-Ternero, J. (2015). Taxation and poverty. Social Choice and Welfare, pages 1{23.

    Chambers, C. and Thomson, W. (2002). Group order preservation and the proportional rule for the adjudication of con icting claims. Mathematical Social Sciences, 44:235{252.

    Chun, Y. (1988). The proportional solution for rights problems. Mathematical Social Sciences, 15:231{246.

    Chun, Y. and Thomson, W. (2005). Convergence under replication of rules to adjudicate con icting claims. Games and Economic Behavior, 50(2):129{142.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark