Formative evaluation for complex interactive systems

Part of book or chapter of book English OPEN
Roast, Chris ; Uruchurtu, Elizabeth (2013)
  • Publisher: Springer Verlag

This paper reports upon the design and use of a lightweight evaluation method, especially designed to examine complex interactive systems. The approach is illustrated through a case study involving an interactive tool designed to help enable users examine large scale data arising from authentication activity in higher education institutes. The evaluation approach illustrated is to enable the lightweight assessment of usability issues within complex interactive systems and identifying opportunities for significant design improvements. Specifically we argue that this method benefits from capturing key generic factors that underpin the effectiveness of tools for working with complex data. The paper concludes by reflecting upon the effectiveness of the lightweight structured assessment approach and how it supports to formative evaluation.
  • References (12)
    12 references, page 1 of 2

    1. Blackwell, A.F. & Green, T.R.G. (2000). A Cognitive Dimensions questionnaire optimised for users. In A.F. Blackwell & E. Bilotta (Eds.) Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Meeting of the Psychology of Programming Interest Group, 137-152.

    2. Blandford, A., Green, T. & Connell, I. (2005) Formalising an understanding of usersystem misfits. In R. Bastide, P. Palanque & J. Roth (Eds.) Proc. EHCI-DSVIS 2004. Springer: LNCS 3425. 253-270.

    3. Dearden, A. M. and Finlay, J. (2006). Pattern languages in HCI: a critical review. Human computer interaction, 21 (1), 49-102.

    4. Green, T.R.G. and Blackwell, A.F. (1998). Design for usability using Cognitive Dimensions. Tutorial session at British Computer Society conference on Human Computer Interaction HCI'98. http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~afb21/CognitiveDimensions/CDtutorial.pdf

    5. Green, T.R.G., Blandford, A.E., Church, L., Roast, C.R. and Clarke, S. (2006) Cognitive dimensions: Achievements, new directions, and open questions in Journal of Visual Languages and Computing 17(4), 328-365, DOI: 10.1016/j.jvlc.2006.04.004.

    6. Grudin, J. (1989). The case against user interface consistency. CACM 32, 10 (October 1989), 1164-1173. DOI=10.1145/67933.67934

    7. Nielsen, J. and Molich R. (1990) Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '90), Jane Carrasco Chew and John Whiteside (Eds.). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 249-256. DOI=10.1145/97243.97281

    8. Nielsen, J. (1993) Usability Engineering. Boston: Academic Press.

    9. Roast, C. R. and Khazaei, B. (2007). An investigation into the validation of formalised cognitive dimensions. In: Interactive systems: design, specification, and verification. Berlin, Springer, 109-122.

    10. Roast, C., Dearden, A. and Uruchurtu, E. (2011). Using and utilizing an innovative media development tool. Proceeding of IHC & CLIHC 2011.

  • Metrics
    0
    views in OpenAIRE
    0
    views in local repository
    71
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive - IRUS-UK 0 71
Share - Bookmark