Female-perpetrated sexual abuse: a review of victim and professional perspectives

Article English OPEN
Clements, Hannah ; Dawson, David L. ; das Nair, Roshan (2013)
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis
  • Related identifiers: doi: 10.1080/13552600.2013.798690
  • Subject:
    mesheuropmc: education | humanities | health care economics and organizations

Professional attitudes towards female-perpetrated sexual abuse (FPSA) reportedly reflect the gender-role expectations found in broader society, which cast males almost exclusively as sexual aggressors or willing sexual recipients, females as sexually non-coercive or victims and male perpetrated sexual abuse as particularly significant or injurious. Such views, however, appear to stand in contrast to the perspectives of individuals who have experienced FPSA. This paper details a systematic review of peer-reviewed quantitative and qualitative literature examining these different (professional and victim) perspectives. Although the methodological shortcomings of primary papers limit the conclusions that can be drawn, the findings suggest that victim and professional perspectives of FPSA remain discrepant; professionals generally considered FPSA as less serious, less harmful and less deserving of investigation than male-perpetrated abuse; while victims of FPSA felt their experiences influenced significantly their psychological wellbeing and abilities to form and maintain interpersonal relationships. These findings are discussed in relation to professional practice and suggestions for future research.
  • References (25)
    25 references, page 1 of 3

    Allen, C. (1990). Women as perpetrators of child sexual abuse: Recognition barriers. In A. Horton, B. Johnson, L. Roundy & D. Williams (Eds.), The incest perpetrator: A family member no one wants to treat (pp. 108-125). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

    Bader, S. M., Scalora, M. J., Casady, T. K., & Black, S. (2008). Female sexual abuse and criminal justice intervention: a comparison of child protective service and criminal justice samples. Child abuse & neglect, 32(1), 111-119. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.04.014

    ChildLine. (2009). ChildLine Casenotes: Calls to ChildLine about Sexual Abuse. London, UK: NSPCC.

    Cortoni, F., Hanson, R. K., & Coache, M. E`. (2010). The recidivism rates of female sexual offenders are low: A metaanalysis. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22(4), 387-401.

    Davis, J. L., & Petretic-Jackson, P. A. (2000). The impact of child sexual abuse on adult interpersonal functioning: A review and synthesis of the empirical literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 5(3), 291-328. doi:10.1016/S1359- 1789(99)00010-5

    *Deering, R., & Mellor, D. (2011). An exploratory qualitative study of the self-reported impact of female-perpetrated childhood sexual abuse. Journal of child sexual abuse, 20(1), 58-76. doi:10.1080/10538712.2011.539964

    *Denov, M. S. (2001). Culture of Denial: Exploring Professional Perspectives on Female Sex Offending. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 43, 303.

    Denov, M. S. (2003). To a safer place? Victims of sexual abuse by females and their disclosures to professionals. Child abuse & neglect, 27(1), 47-61. doi:10.1016/S0145-2134(02)00509-4

    *Denov, M. S. (2004). The Long-Term Effects of Child Sexual Abuse by Female Perpetrators: A Qualitative Study of Male and Female Victims. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19(10), 1137-1156. doi:10.1177/0886260504269093

    *Duncan, L. E., & Williams, L. M. (1998). Gender role socialization and male-on-male vs. female-on-male child sexual abuse. Sex roles, 39(910), 765-785. doi:10.1023/A:1018864202537

  • Similar Research Results (2)
  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark