Plant responses to photoperiod

Article English OPEN
Jackson, Stephen D. (2009)

Photoperiod controls many developmental responses in animals, plants and even fungi. The response to photoperiod has evolved because daylength is a reliable indicator\ud of the time of year, enabling developmental events to be scheduled to coincide with particular environmental conditions. Much progress has been made towards\ud understanding the molecular mechanisms involved in the response to photoperiod in plants. These mechanisms include the detection of the light signal in the leaves,\ud the entrainment of circadian rhythms, and the production of a mobile signal which is transmitted throughout the plant. Flowering, tuberization and bud set are just a few of the many different responses in plants that are under photoperiodic control. Comparison of what is known of the molecular mechanisms controlling these responses shows that, whilst common components exist, significant differences in the regulatory mechanisms have evolved between these responses.
  • References (155)
    155 references, page 1 of 16

    Abe M, Kobayashi Y, Yamamoto S, Daimon Y, Yamaguchi A, Ikeda Y, Ichinoki H, Notaguchi M, Goto K, Araki T. 2005. FD, a bZIP protein mediating signals from the floral pathway integrator FT at the shoot apex. Science 309: 1052-1056.

    Achard P, Herr A, Baulcombe DC, Harberd NP. 2004. Modulation of floral development by a gibberellin-regulated microRNA. Development 131: 3357-3365.

    Adams SR, Pearson S, Hadley P. 2001. Improving quantitative flowering models through a better understanding of the phases of photoperiod sensitivity. Journal of Experimental Botany 52: 655-662.

    Adams SR, Pearson S, Hadley P, Patefield WM. 1999. The effects of temperature and light integral on the phases of photoperiod sensitivity in Petunia × hybrida. Annals of Botany 83: 263-269.

    Alabadi D, Oyama T, Yanovsky MJ, Harmon FG, Más P, Kay SA. 2001. Reciprocal regulation between TOC1 and LHY/CCA1 within the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Science 293: 880-883.

    An H, Roussot C, Suárez-López P, Corbesier L, Vincent C, Piñeiro M, Hepworth S, Mouradov A, Justin S, Turnbull C et al. 2004. CONSTANS acts in the phloem to regulate a systemic signal that induces photoperiodic flowering of Arabidopsis. Development 131: 3615-3626.

    von Arnim AG, Deng XW. 1994. Light inactivation of Arabidopsis photomorphogenic repressor COP1 involves a cell-specific regulation of its nucleocytoplasmic partitioning. Cell 79: 1035-1045.

    Asai K, Satoh N, Sasaki H, Satoh H, Nagato Y. 2002. A rice heterochronic mutant, mori1, is defective in the juvenile-adult phase change. Development 129: 265-273.

    Aukerman MJ, Sakai H. 2003. Regulation of flowering time and floral organ identity by a microRNA and its APETALA2-like target genes. Plant Cell 15: 2730-2741.

    Balasubramanian S, Sureshkumar S, Lempe J, Weigel D. 2006. Potent induction of Arabidopsis thaliana flowering by elevated growth temperature. PLoS Genetics 2: 0980-0989.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark