Inside ‘Inside View’: reflections on stimulating debate and engagement through a multimedia live theatre production on the dilemmas and issues of pre‐natal screening policy and practice

Other literature type, Article English OPEN
Hundt, Gillian Lewando ; Bryanston, Claudette ; Lowe, Pam ; Cross, Saul ; Sandall, Jane ; Spencer, Kevin (2010)

Background The role of applied theatre in engaging both lay and professional publics with debate on health policy and practice is an emergent field. This paper discusses the development, production performance and discussion of ‘Inside View’.\ud \ud Objectives The objectives were to produce applied theatre from research findings of a completed study on genetic prenatal screening, exploring the dilemmas for women and health professionals of prenatal genetic screening, and to engage audiences in debate and reflection on the dilemmas of prenatal genetic screening.\ud \ud Methods ‘Inside View’ was developed from a multidisciplinary research study through identification of emergent themes from qualitative interviews, and development of these by the writer, theatre producer and media technologist with input from the researchers.\ud \ud Findings Inside View was performed in London and the Midlands to varied audiences with a panel discussion and evaluation post performance. The audiences were engaged in debate that was relevant to them professionally and personally. Knowledge translation through applied theatre is an effective tool for engaging the public but the impact subsequently is unclear. There are ethical issues of unexpected disclosure during discussion post performance and the process of transforming research findings into applied theatre requires time and trust within the multidisciplinary team as well as adequate resourcing.
  • References (12)
    12 references, page 1 of 2

    1. Kerr A. Cunningham-Burley S., Tutton R. Shifting Subject Positions: Experts and Lay People in Public Dialogue, Social Studies of Science, 2007: 37, 385-410

    2. Starkey F. Orme J. Evaluation of a primary school drug drama project: methodological issues and key findings, Health Education Research 2001: 16, 5:609-622

    3. Nisker J., Martin D.K., Bluhm R. Daar AS (2006) Theatre as a public engagement tool for health-policy development, Health Policy 2006:78, 258-271

    4. Sinding C. Gray R. Fitch M. Greenberg M. (2002) Staging Breast Cancer: Rehearsing Metastatic Disease Qualitative Health Research 12 (1) 61-73

    5. Williams, C. Sandall, J. Lewando Hundt, G. Grellier, R. Heyman, B, Spencer, K. (2005) 'Women as 'moral pioneers'?: experiences of first trimester nuchal translucency screening', Social Science and Medicine,2005: 61, 1983-92.

    6. Heyman B. Hundt G., Sandall J., Williams C., Spencer K. Grellier R. (2006) On being at higher risk: a qualitative study of prenatal screening for chromosomal anomalies Social Science and Medicine 2006: 62, 2360 -72

    7. Lewando Hundt G. et al Navigating the troubled waters of prenatal testing decisions pp. 25-39 in New Technologies in Health Care: Challenge, Change and Innovation Ed. A. J.Webster Palgrave Basingstoke. 2006

    8. Harvey B and Tony J.S (2000) Evaluation of a drama-in-education programme to increase AIDS awareness in South African high schools: a randomized community intervention trial International Journal of STD & AIDS, 11 (2) 105-111

    9. Macdonald G and Nehammer S (2003) An evaluation of a drug education play for schools in South Wales. Health Education 2003:103(2)83-87

    10. Stuttaford M., Bryanston,C., Lewando Hundt G., Connor M. Thorogood M. Tollman S. (2006)The Use of Applied Theatre in Health Research Dissemination and data validation : A Pilot study from South Africa Health 2006:10, 31-45

  • Metrics
    No metrics available