Acceptability and potential effectiveness of commercial portion control tools amongst people with obesity

Article English OPEN
Solis-Trapala, I ; Almiron-Roig, E ; Dominguez, A ; Vaughan, D ; Jebb, S (2016)
  • Publisher: Cambridge University Press
  • Journal: British Journal of Nutrition (issn: 0007-1145, vol: 116)
  • Related identifiers: doi: 10.1017/S0007114516004104
  • Subject: RA0421

Exposure to large portion sizes is a risk factor for obesity. Specifically designed tableware may modulate how much is eaten and help with portion control. We examined the experience of using a guided crockery set (CS) and a calibrated serving spoon set (SS) by individuals trying to manage their weight. Twenty-nine obese adults who had completed 7–12 weeks of a community weight-loss programme were invited to use both tools for 2 weeks each, in a crossover design, with minimal health professional contact. A paper-based questionnaire was used to collect data on acceptance, perceived changes in portion size, frequency, and type of meal when the tool was used. Scores describing acceptance, ease of use and perceived effectiveness were derived from five-point Likert scales from which binary indicators (high/low) were analysed using logistic regression. Mean acceptance, ease of use and perceived effectiveness were moderate to high (3·7–4·4 points). Tool type did not have an impact on indicators of acceptance, ease of use and perceived effectiveness (P>0·32 for all comparisons); 55 % of participants used the CS on most days v. 21 % for the SS. The CS was used for all meals, whereas the SS was mostly used for evening meals. Self-selected portion sizes increased for vegetables and decreased for chips and potatoes with both tools. Participants rated both tools as equally acceptable, easy to use and with similar perceived effectiveness. Formal trials to evaluate the impact of such tools on weight control are warranted.
  • References (38)
    38 references, page 1 of 4

    1. Hollands GJ, Shemilt I, Marteau TM, et al. (2015) Portion, package or tableware size for changing selection and consumption of food, alcohol and tobacco. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015, issue 9, CD011045.

    2. Diliberti N, Bordi PL, Conklin MT, et al. (2004) Increased portion size leads to increased energy intake in a restaurant meal. Obes Res 12, 562-568.

    3. Ledickwe JH, Ello-Martin JA & Rolls BJ (2005) Portion sizes and the obesity epidemic. J Nutr 135, 905-909.

    4. Rolls BJ (2014) What is the role of portion control in weight management? Int J Obes 38, Suppl. 1, S1-S8.

    5. Lewis HB, Ahern AL, Solis-Trapala I, et al. (2015) Effect of reducing portion size at a compulsory meal on later energy intake, gut hormones, and appetite in overweight adults. Obesity (Silver Spring) 23, 1362-1370.

    6. Hannum SM, Carson L, Evans EM, et al. (2004) Use of portioncontrolled entrees enhances weight loss in women. Obes Res 12, 538-546.

    7. Cavanagh K, Vartanian LR, Herman CP, et al. (2014) The effect of portion size on food intake is robust to brief education and mindfulness exercises. J Health Psychol 19, 730-739.

    8. Spanos S, Kenda AS & Vartanian LR (2015) Can serving-size labels reduce the portion-size effect? A pilot study. Eat Behav 16, 40-42.

    9. Harnack L, Steffen L, Arnett DK, et al. (2004) Accuracy of estimation of large food portions. J Am Diet Assoc 104, 804-806.

    10. Condrasky M, Ledikwe JH, Flood JE, et al. (2007) Chefs' opinions of restaurant portion sizes. Obesity (Silver Spring) 15, 2086-2094.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark