The PHAR-QA Project: Competency Framework for Pharmacy Practice—First Steps, the Results of the European Network Delphi Round 1

Other literature type, Article English OPEN
Atkinson, Jeffrey ; De Paepe, Kristien ; Pozo, Antonio Sánchez ; Rekkas, Dimitrios ; Volmer, Daisy ; Hirvonen, Jouni ; Bozic, Borut ; Skowron, Agnieska ; Mircioiu, Constantin ; Marcincal, Annie ; Koster, Andries ; Wilson, Keith ; van Schravendijk, Chris (2015)
  • Publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
  • Journal: Pharmacy, volume 3, issue 4, pages 307-329 (issn: 2226-4787, eissn: 2226-4787)
  • Related identifiers: doi: 10.3390/pharmacy3040307, pmc: PMC5597109
  • Subject: 317 Pharmacy | competence | practice | pharmacy | Article
    mesheuropmc: education | health care economics and organizations

PHAR-QA, funded by the European Commission, is producing a framework of competences for pharmacy practice. The framework is in line with the EU directive on sectoral professions and takes into account the diversity of the pharmacy profession and the on-going changes in healthcare systems (with an increasingly important role for pharmacists), and in the pharmaceutical industry. PHAR-QA is asking academia, students and practicing pharmacists to rank competences required for practice. The results show that competences in the areas of “drug interactions”, “need for drug treatment” and “provision of information and service” were ranked highest whereas those in the areas of “ability to design and conduct research” and “development and production of medicines” were ranked lower. For the latter two categories, industrial pharmacists ranked them higher than did the other five groups. Peer reviewed
  • References (40)
    40 references, page 1 of 4

    Available online: (accessed on 12 November 2015).

    The European Commission. The EU Directive 2013/55/EU on the Recognition of Professional Qualifications. Available online: 2005:255:0022:0142:EN:PDF (accessed on 18 March 2014).

    Atkinson, J.; Rombaut, B. The PHARMINE paradigm-matching the supply of pharmacy education and training to demands. Eur. Ind. Pharm. 2010, 6, 4-7.

    Pharm. Pract. 2011, 9, 169-187.

    Atkinson, J.; Rombaut, B.; Sánchez Pozo, A.; Rekkas, D.; Veski, P.; Hirvonen, J.; Bozic, B.; Skowron, A.; Mircioiu, C.; Marcincal, A.; et al. Systems for Quality Assurance in Pharmacy Education and Training in the European Union. Pharmacy 2014, 2, 17-26.

    6. International Pharmaceutical Federation. FIP Education Initiative. In Quality Assurance of Pharmacy Education: The FIP Global Framework, 2nd ed.; 2014. Available online: files/fip/PharmacyEducation/Quality_Assurance/QA_Framework_2nd_Edition_online_version.pdf (accessed on 12 November 2015).

    7. Bruno, A.; Bates, I.; Brock, T.; Anderson, C. Towards a global competency framework. Am. J. Pharm. Educ. 2010, 74, 56.

    8. Govaerts, M.J. Educational competencies or education for professional competence? Med. Educ. 2008, 42, 234-236.

    9. Mestrovic, A.; Stanicic, Z.; Ortner-Hadziabdic, M.; Mucalo, I.; Bates, I.; Duggan, C.; Carter, S.; Bruno, A.; Košiček, M. Individualized education and competency development of Croatian community pharmacists using the General Level Framework. Am. J. Pharm. Educ. 2012, 76, 23.

    10. Dorman, T.; Miller, B.M. Continuing medical education: The link between physician learning and health care outcomes. Acad. Med. 2011, 86, 1339.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark