Electrostatic phase separation: a review

Article English OPEN
Mhatre, S. ; Vivacqua, V. ; Ghadiri, M. ; Abdullah, A.M. ; Al-Marri, M.J. ; Hassanpour, A. ; Hewakandamby, Buddhika N. ; Azzopardi, Barry J. ; Kermani, B. (2015)
  • Publisher: Elsevier
  • Journal: Chemical Engineering Research and Design, volume 96, pages 177-195 (issn: 0263-8762)
  • Related identifiers: doi: 10.1016/j.cherd.2015.02.012
  • Subject: Chemistry(all) | Chemical Engineering(all)

The current understanding and developments in the electrostatic phase separation are reviewed. The literature covers predominantly two immiscible and inter-dispersed liquids following the last review on the topic some 15 years. Electrocoalescence kinetics and governing parameters, such as the applied field, liquid properties, drop shape and flow, are considered. The unfavorable effects, such as chain formation and partial coalescence, are discussed in detail. Moreover, the prospects of microfluidics platforms, non-uniform fields, coalescence on the dielectric surfaces to enhance the electrocoalescence rate are also considered. In addition to the electrocoalescence in water-in-oil emulsions the research in oil-in-oil coalescence is also discussed. Finally the studies in electrocoalescer development and commercial devices are also surveyed.\ud \ud The analysis of the literature reveals that the use of pulsed DC and AC electric fields is preferred over constant DC fields for efficient coalescence; but the selection of the optimum field frequency a priori is still not possible and requires further research. Some recent studies have helped to clarify important aspects of the process such as partial coalescence and drop–drop non-coalescence. On the other hand, some key phenomena such as thin film breakup and chain formation are still unclear. Some designs of inline electrocoalescers have recently been proposed; however with limited success: the inadequate knowledge of the underlying physics still prevents this technology from leaving the realm of empiricism and fully developing in one based on rigorous scientific methodology.
  • References (155)
    155 references, page 1 of 16

    Abeynaike, A., Sederman, A.J., Khan, Y., Johns, M.L., Davidson, J.F., Mackley, M.R., 2012. The experimental measurement and modeling of sedimentation and creaming for glycerol/ biodiesel droplet dispersions. Chem. Eng. Sci. 79, 125-137.

    Adamiak, K., 1999. Force of attraction between two conducting droplets in electric field. Thirty-Fourth I.A.C. Annual Meeting IEEE 3, 1795-1800.

    Adamiak, K., 2001. Interaction of two dielectric or conducting droplets aligned in the uniform electric field. J. Electrostat. 51, 578-584.

    Aida, K., Na, Y., Nagaya, T., Orihara, H., 2010. Droplet coalescence process under electric fields in an immiscible polymer blend. Phys. Rev. E 82, 031805.

    Allan, R.S., Mason, S.G., 1961. Effects of electric fields on coalescence in liquid-liquid systems. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 57 (11), 2027-2040.

    Allan, R.S., Mason, S.G., 1962. Particle motions in sheared suspensions: XIV. coalescence of liquid drops in electric and shear fields. J. Colloid Sci. 17, 383-408.

    Al-Sabagh, A.M., Kandile, N.G., El-Din, M.R.N., 2011. Functions of demulsifiers in the petroleum industry. Sep. Sci. Technol. 46 (7), 1144-1163.

    Aryafar, H., Kavehpour, H.P., 2006. Drop coalescence through planar surfaces. Phys. Fluids 18, 072105-072106.

    Aryafar, H., Kavehpour, P., 2007. Electrocoalescence. Phys. Fluids 19, 091107.

    Aryafar, H., Kavehpour, H.P., 2009. Electrocoalescence: effects of dc electric fields on coalescence of drops at planar interfaces. Langmuir 25, 12460-12465.

  • Related Research Results (1)
  • Similar Research Results (3)
  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark