On Demand: Exploring the Potential of Electronic Feedback on Assessment Performance

Article English OPEN
Snowden, Michael ; Daley-Yates, Sue ; Halsall, Jamie P. (2016)
  • Publisher: Academic Research Publishing Group
  • Subject: L1

This paper presents the findings from an evaluatory pedagogical project that utilised an ethnographic case study approach to examine factors influencing the use of online formative assessment and feedback within an undergraduate programme.\ud The project posed the questions: \ud • What are the effects of introducing online formative assessment and feedback on learning and assessment performance? \ud • How effective is online formative feedback in enhancing student success?\ud The study draws upon data collected from a sample of students (22) who volunteered to participate in the research over a period of one academic year. Data collection tools included: focus group interview, semi-structured questionnaire and student assessment data. The study demonstrates that formative feedback and assessment is beneficial for teaching and learning, and that electronic assessment can offer a more flexible approach that can complement f2f feedback. Online formative feedback in the context of this study had a positive effect upon academic performance and student satisfaction, and demonstrates that students find online formative feedback effective and meaningful. Whilst the small size of the sample influences generalizability, the findings agree with the wealth of literature surrounding formative assessment and the benefits that accrue to students from delivering effective feedback. In addition, evidence from participants in this study is reflected in reports such as the JISC guide: “Effective Assessment in a Digital Age” (2010) and the findings from the EBEAM Project (2012) (Ellis, 2012
  • References (24)
    24 references, page 1 of 3

    Ahmed, N. and Teviotdale, W. (2007).The Value of Formative Assessment in Higher Education [online]. Available at: http://www.ece.salford.ac.uk/proceedings/papers/39_07.pdf [Accessed 4th October 2014].

    Barnett, R. (2014).Conditions of Flexibility: Securing a more responsive higher education system. York: HEA

    Bennett, E. and Youde, A. (2010). 'E-Tutoring'. In Avis, J., Fisher, R. and Thompson, R. (eds.)Teaching in Lifelong Learning: A Guide to Theory and Practice. Maidenhead: Open University press, pp.154-162.

    Black, P. and William, D. (1998). 'Assessment and Classroom Learning', Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, Vol. 5 (1), March, pp.7-71.

    Brown, G., Bull, J. and Pendlebury, M. (1997).Assessing Student Learning in Higher Education. London: Routledge.

    Brown, S. (2006).Using Formative Assessment to promote student learning [online]. Available at: http://www.ldu.leeds.ac.uk/news/events/documents/BrownPowerPoint.pdf [Accessed 4th October 2014].

    Butt, G. (2010).Making Assessment Matter. London: Continuum.

    Cassell, C. and Symon, G. (Eds.). (2004). Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research. London: Sage.

    Catterall, M. and Maclaran, P.(1997). 'Focus Group Data and Qualitative Analysis Programs: Coding the Moving Picture as Well as the Snapshots', Sociological Research Online, Vol. 2 (1). Available at: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/2/1/6.html. [Accessed 19thSeptember 2014].

    Cohen, L., Manion, L. and Morrison, K. (2000).Research Methods in Education. 5th ed. Abingdon: RoutledgeFalmer

  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    University of Huddersfield Repository - IRUS-UK 0 124
Share - Bookmark