Methodology for the development of bridge-specific fragility curves

Article English OPEN
Stefanidou, S.P. ; Kappos, A. J. (2017)

A new methodology for the development of bridge-specific fragility curves is proposed with a view to improving the reliability of loss assessment in road networks and prioritising retrofit of the bridge stock. The key features of the proposed methodology are the explicit definition of critical limit state thresholds for individual bridge components, with consideration of the effect of varying geometry, material properties, reinforcement and loading patterns on the component capacity; the methodology also includes the quantification of uncertainty in capacity, demand and damage state definition. Advanced analysis methods and tools (nonlinear static analysis and incremental dynamic response history analysis) are used for bridge component capacity and demand estimation, while reduced sampling techniques are used for uncertainty treatment. Whereas uncertainty in both capacity and demand is estimated from nonlinear analysis of detailed inelastic models, in practical application to bridge stocks, the demand is estimated through a standard response spectrum analysis of a simplified elastic model of the bridge. The simplified methodology can be efficiently applied to a large number of bridges (with different characteristics) within a road network, by means of an ad hoc developed software involving the use of a generic (elastic) bridge model, which derives bridge-specific fragility curves.
  • References (43)
    43 references, page 1 of 5

    1. Billah AHMM, Alam MS. Seismic fragility assessment of highway bridges: a state-of-the-art review. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 2015; 11(6):804-832.

    2. Cardone D. Displacement limits and performance displacement profiles in support of direct displacement-based seismic assessment of bridges. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 2013; 43(8):1239-1263.

    3. Banerjee S, Shinozuka M. Nonlinear Static Procedure for Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Bridges. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 2007; 22(4):293-305.

    4. Moschonas IF, Kappos AJ, Panetsos P, Papadopoulos V, Makarios T, Thanopoulos P. Seismic fragility curves for greek bridges: methodology and case studies. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 2008; 7(2):439-468.

    5. Choi E, DesRoches R, Nielson B. Seismic fragility of typical bridges in moderate seismic zones. Engineering Structures 2004; 26(2):187-199.

    6. Zhang J, Huo Y. Evaluating effectiveness and optimum design of isolation devices for highway bridges using the fragility function method. Engineering Structures 2009; 31(8):1648-1660.

    7. DesRoches R, Padgett J, Ramanathan K, Dukes J. Feasibility Studies for Improving Caltrans Bridge Fragility Relationships. Report CA 12-1775. Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, U.S.A, 2012.

    8. Berry M, Eberhard M. Performance Models for Flexural Damage in Reinforced Concrete Columns. PEER Report 2003/18, University of California, Berkeley, 2003.

    9. Nielson BG. Analytical Fragility Curves for Highway Bridges in Moderate Seismic Zones Analytical Fragility Curves for Highway Bridges in Moderate Seismic Zones. PhD Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, 2005.

    10. Crowley H, Colombi M, Silva V, Monteiro R, Ozcebe S, Fardis M, Tsionis G, Askouni P. SYNERG : Deliverable D3.6-Fragility functions for roadway bridges, University of Pavia, Italy, 2011.

  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    City Research Online - IRUS-UK 0 28
Share - Bookmark