Expert-performance-practitioner-centred modes of knowledge and models of intelligibility: disciplinary specificity and the digital submission

Part of book or chapter of book English OPEN
Melrose, Susan (2012)
  • Publisher: SAGE Publications

The ongoing focus, in the university, on inter-disciplinarity has tended, over recent decades, to encourage many researchers to overlook the disciplinary specificity of expert or professional performance-making practices in the performing arts, and to erase issues of disciplinary specificity from the discourses many of us produce and reproduce in the contexts of research. Alongside this development in discourse production we tend to find widespread ‘difficulties’ when it comes to the inclusion – in, for example, higher degree research ‘documents’ - of other modes of presentation of expert practice. In this chapter I ponder some of the implications of this neglect or erasure, for those of us who seek to document performance-making in the higher degree context, and how some of us might begin to argue for and effect change in a key area of contemporary higher degree practice: the digital thesis produced, submitted and assessed in the postgraduate/higher degree context and set-ups. An enquiry through expert practices, into the practices bound-up in digitised presentations of research is thus, by very definition, an epistemic enquiry, praxiological in nature.
  • References (16)
    16 references, page 1 of 2

    de Certeau, M. (1984). The Practice of Everyday Life (trans : S. Randall). Berkley, CA: University of California Press.

    Deleuze, G. (2001). Difference and Repetition (trans: P. Patton). London : Continuum Publishing .

    Deleuze, G. (2005). Francis Bacon; The Logic of Sensation (trans: D. W. Smith). London: Contin uum Publishing.

    Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (1994). What is Philosophy? (trans. G. Burchell & H. Tom li nson}. London: Verso Books .

    Hayles, K. N. (1999). How we Became Posthuman. Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature and Informatics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press .

    Jameson, F. (1991). Postmodernism, or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. London: Verso Books.

    Knorr Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Un iversity Press.

    Knorr Cetina, K. (2001). Objectua l practices. In: T. Schatzki, K. Knorr Cetina, & E. Von Savigny (Eds.), The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London: Routledge.

    Laermans, R. & Gielen, P. (2007). The archive of the digital an-archive. Image and Narrative, Issue 17 The Digital Archive, April 2007; http://www.imageandnarrative.be/inarchive/digital_archive/digital_archive.htm

    Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge (trans. G. Bonnington and B. Massumi). University of Minnesota Press; first published in France as La Condition postmoderne: rapport sur Ie savoir (1979), Paris: Les Editions de Minu it.

  • Similar Research Results (1)
  • Metrics
    0
    views in OpenAIRE
    0
    views in local repository
    202
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    Middlesex University Research Repository - IRUS-UK 0 202
Share - Bookmark