Analytic conditions for energy neutrality in Uniformly-Formed wireless sensor networks

Article English OPEN
Besbes, H. ; Smart, G. ; Buranapanichkit, D. ; Andreopoulos, Y. ; Kloukinas, C. (2013)
  • Related identifiers: doi: 10.1109/TWC.2013.092013.121649
  • Subject: TK
    arxiv: Computer Science::Networking and Internet Architecture

Future deployments of wireless sensor network (WSN) infrastructures for environmental or event monitoring are expected to be equipped with energy harvesters (e.g. piezoelectric, thermal, photovoltaic) in order to substantially increase their autonomy. In this paper we derive conditions for energy neutrality, i.e. perpetual energy autonomy per sensor node, by balancing the node's expected energy consumption with its expected energy harvesting capability. Our analysis assumes a uniformly-formed WSN, i.e. a network comprising identical transmitter sensor nodes and identical receiver/relay sensor nodes with a balanced cluster-tree topology. The proposed framework is parametric to: (i) the duty cycle for the network activation; (ii) the number of nodes in the same tier of the cluster-tree topology; (iii) the consumption rate of the receiver node(s) that collect (and possibly relay) data along with their own; (iv) the marginal probability density function (PDF) characterizing the data transmission rate per node; (v) the expected amount of energy harvested by each node. Based on our analysis, we obtain the number of nodes leading to the minimumenergy harvestingrequirement for each tier of the WSN cluster-tree topology. We also derive closed-form expressions for the difference in the minimum energy harvesting requirements between four transmission rate PDFs in function of the WSN parameters. Our analytic results are validated via experiments using TelosB sensor nodes and an energy measurement testbed. Our framework is useful for feasibility studies on energy harvesting technologies in WSNs and for optimizing the operational settings of hierarchical WSN-based monitoring infrastructures prior to time-consuming testing and deployment within the application environment.
  • References (47)
    47 references, page 1 of 5

    [1] A. Bachir, M. Dohler, T. Watteyne, and K.K. Leung, “MAC essentials for wireless sensor networks,” IEEE Comm. Surv. Tut., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 222 -248, quarter 2010.

    [2] A. Kansal, J. Hsu, S. Zahedi, and M. B. Srivastava, “Power management in energy harvesting sensor networks,” ACM Trans. Embed. Comput. Syst., vol. 6, no. 4, Sep. 2007.

    [3] S. Sudevalayam and P. Kulkarni, “Energy harvesting sensor nodes: Survey and implications,” IEEE Comm. Surv. Tut., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 443 -461, quarter 2011.

    [4] S. Chalasani and J.M. Conrad, “A survey of energy harvesting sources for embedded systems,” in IEEE Southeastcon, 2008, Apr. 2008, pp. 442 -447.

    [5] He C., M.E. Kiziroglou, D.C. Yates, and E.M. Yeatman, “A MEMS self-powered sensor and RF transmission platform for WSN nodes,” IEEE Sensors J., vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 3437 -3445, Dec. 2011.

    [6] D. Buranapanichkit and Y. Andreopoulos, “Distributed time-frequency division multiple access protocol for wireless sensor networks,” IEEE Wirel. Comm. Lett., vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 440 -443, Oct. 2012.

    [7] L. Tang, Y. Sun, O. Gurewitz, and D. B. Johnson, “EM-MAC: a dynamic multichannel energy-efficient MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks,” in Proc. of the 12th ACM Int. Symp. on Mob. Ad Hoc Netw. and Comput., New York, NY, USA, 2011, MobiHoc '11, pp. 23:1-23:11, ACM.

    [8] A. Koubaa, A. Cunha, and M. Alves, “A time division beacon scheduling mechanism for IEEE 802.15.4/zigbee cluster-tree wireless sensor networks,” in 19th Euromicro Conf. on Real-Time Syst., ECRTS '07, july 2007, pp. 125 -135.

    [9] G. Lu, B. Krishnamachari, and C.S. Raghavendra, “Performance evaluation of the IEEE 802.15. 4 MAC for low-rate low-power wireless networks,” in IEEE Internat. Conf. on Perf., Comput., and Comm. IEEE, 2004, pp. 701-706.

    [10] J. Yang and S. Ulukus, “Optimal packet scheduling in an energy harvesting communication system,” IEEE Trans. on Communications, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 220-230, 2012.

  • Software (1)
  • Metrics
    No metrics available